Circadian plasticity evolves through regulatory changes in a neuropeptide gene – Nature
Rieger, D., Stanewsky, R. & Helfrich-Forster, C. Cryptochrome, compound eyes, Hofbauer-Buchner eyelets, and ocelli play different roles in the entrainment and masking pathway of the locomotor activity rhythm in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster. J. Biol. Rhythms 18, 377–391 (2003).
Google Scholar
Auer, T. O., Shahandeh, M. P. & Benton, R. Drosophila sechellia: a genetic model for behavioral evolution and neuroecology. Annu. Rev. Genet. 55, 527–554 (2021).
Google Scholar
Roca, I. T. et al. Shifting song frequencies in response to anthropogenic noise: a meta-analysis on birds and anurans. Behav. Ecol. 27, 1269–1274 (2016).
Google Scholar
Caldwell, A. J., While, G. M. & Wapstra, E. Plasticity of thermoregulatory behaviour in response to the thermal environment by widespread and alpine reptile species. Anim. Behav. 132, 217–227 (2017).
Google Scholar
Muraro, N. I., Pirez, N. & Ceriani, M. F. The circadian system: plasticity at many levels. Neuroscience 247, 280–293 (2013).
Google Scholar
Wang, G. et al. Clock genes and environmental cues coordinate Anopheles pheromone synthesis, swarming, and mating. Science 371, 411–415 (2021).
Google Scholar
Horn, M. et al. The circadian clock improves fitness in the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster. Front. Physiol. 10, 1374 (2019).
Google Scholar
Hardeland, R. & Stange, G. Comparative studies on the circadian rhythms of locomotor activity of 40 Drosophila species. J. Interdiscipl. Cycle Res. 4, 353–359 (1973).
Google Scholar
Rieger, D., Peschel, N., Dusik, V., Glotz, S. & Helfrich-Forster, C. The ability to entrain to long photoperiods differs between 3 Drosophila melanogaster wild-type strains and is modified by twilight simulation. J. Biol. Rhythms 27, 37–47 (2012).
Google Scholar
Beauchamp, M. et al. Closely related fruit fly species living at different latitudes diverge in their circadian clock anatomy and rhythmic behavior. J. Biol. Rhythms 33, 602–613 (2018).
Google Scholar
Bywalez, W. et al. The dual-oscillator system of Drosophila melanogaster under natural-like temperature cycles. Chronobiol. Int. 29, 395–407 (2012).
Google Scholar
Matute, D. R., Gavin-Smyth, J. & Liu, G. Variable post-zygotic isolation in Drosophila melanogaster/D. simulans hybrids. J. Evol. Biol. 27, 1691–1705 (2014).
Google Scholar
Lachaise, D. et al. in Historical Biogeography of the Drosophila melanogaster Species Subgroup (eds. Hecht, M. K., Wallace, B. & Prance, G. T.) 159–225 (Plenum, 1988).
Dean, M. D. & Ballard, J. W. Linking phylogenetics with population genetics to reconstruct the geographic origin of a species. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 32, 998–1009 (2004).
Google Scholar
Hardin, P. E. Molecular genetic analysis of circadian timekeeping in Drosophila. Adv. Genet. 74, 141–173 (2011).
Google Scholar
Hermann-Luibl, C. & Helfrich-Forster, C. Clock network in Drosophila. Curr. Opin. Insect Sci. 7, 65–70 (2015).
Google Scholar
Vaze, K. M. & Helfrich-Forster, C. The neuropeptide PDF is crucial for delaying the phase of Drosophila’s evening neurons under long Zeitgeber periods. J. Biol. Rhythms 36, 442–460 (2021).
Google Scholar
Yoshii, T. et al. The neuropeptide pigment-dispersing factor adjusts period and phase of Drosophila’s clock. J. Neurosci. 29, 2597–2610 (2009).
Google Scholar
Schlichting, M. et al. A neural network underlying circadian entrainment and photoperiodic adjustment of sleep and activity in Drosophila. J. Neurosci. 36, 9084–9096 (2016).
Google Scholar
Peschel, N., Chen, K. F., Szabo, G. & Stanewsky, R. Light-dependent interactions between the Drosophila circadian clock factors Cryptochrome, Jetlag, and Timeless. Curr. Biol. 19, 241–247 (2009).
Google Scholar
Gunawardhana, K. L. & Hardin, P. E. VRILLE controls PDF neuropeptide accumulation and arborization rhythms in small ventrolateral neurons to drive rhythmic behavior in Drosophila. Curr. Biol. 27, 3442–3453 (2017).
Google Scholar
Mezan, S., Feuz, J. D., Deplancke, B. & Kadener, S. PDF signaling is an integral part of the Drosophila circadian molecular oscillator. Cell. Rep. 17, 708–719 (2016).
Google Scholar
Grima, B., Chelot, E., Xia, R. & Rouyer, F. Morning and evening peaks of activity rely on different clock neurons of the Drosophila brain. Nature 431, 869–873 (2004).
Google Scholar
Delventhal, R. et al. Dissection of central clock function in Drosophila through cell-specific CRISPR-mediated clock gene disruption. eLife 8, e48308 (2019).
Google Scholar
Stoleru, D., Peng, Y., Agosto, J. & Rosbash, M. Coupled oscillators control morning and evening locomotor behaviour of Drosophila. Nature 431, 862–868 (2004).
Google Scholar
Sheeba, V., Gu, H., Sharma, V. K., O’Dowd, D. K. & Holmes, T. C. Circadian- and light-dependent regulation of resting membrane potential and spontaneous action potential firing of Drosophila circadian pacemaker neurons. J. Neurophysiol. 99, 976–988 (2008).
Google Scholar
Menegazzi, P. et al. A functional clock within the main morning and evening neurons of D. melanogaster is not sufficient for wild-type locomotor activity under changing day length. Front. Physiol. 11, 229 (2020).
Google Scholar
Hermann, C. et al. The circadian clock network in the brain of different Drosophila species. J. Comp. Neurol. 521, 367–388 (2013).
Google Scholar
Park, J. H. et al. Differential regulation of circadian pacemaker output by separate clock genes in Drosophila. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 3608–3613 (2000).
Google Scholar
Fernandez, M. P., Berni, J. & Ceriani, M. F. Circadian remodeling of neuronal circuits involved in rhythmic behavior. PLoS Biol. 6, e69 (2008).
Google Scholar
Herrero, A. et al. Coupling neuropeptide levels to structural plasticity in Drosophila clock neurons. Curr. Biol. 30, 3154–3166 (2020).
Google Scholar
Zhang, L. et al. DN1(p) circadian neurons coordinate acute light and PDF inputs to produce robust daily behavior in Drosophila. Curr. Biol. 20, 591–599 (2010).
Google Scholar
Liang, X., Holy, T. E. & Taghert, P. H. A series of suppressive signals within the Drosophila circadian neural circuit generates sequential daily outputs. Neuron 94, 1173–1189 (2017).
Google Scholar
Ryczek, N., Lys, A. & Makalowska, I. The functional meaning of 5’UTR in protein-coding genes. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 24, 2976 (2023).
Bailey, T. L. & Elkan, C. Fitting a mixture model by expectation maximization to discover motifs in biopolymers. Proc. Int. Conf. Intell. Syst. Mol. Biol. 2, 28–36 (1994).
Google Scholar
Bergland, A. O., Tobler, R., Gonzalez, J., Schmidt, P. & Petrov, D. Secondary contact and local adaptation contribute to genome-wide patterns of clinal variation in Drosophila melanogaster. Mol. Ecol. 25, 1157–1174 (2016).
Google Scholar
Arguello, J. R., Laurent, S. & Clark, A. G. Demographic history of the human commensal Drosophila melanogaster. Genome Biol. Evol. 11, 844–854 (2019).
Google Scholar
Khatib, L., Subasi, B. S., Fishman, B., Kapun, M. & Tauber, E. Unveiling subtle geographical clines: phenotypic effects and dynamics of circadian clock gene polymorphisms. Biology 12, 858 (2023).
Google Scholar
Lamaze, A. et al. A natural timeless polymorphism allowing circadian clock synchronization in “white nights”. Nat. Commun. 13, 1724 (2022).
Google Scholar
Tauber, E. et al. Natural selection favors a newly derived timeless allele in Drosophila melanogaster. Science 316, 1895–1898 (2007).
Google Scholar
Deppisch, P. et al. Adaptation of Drosophila melanogaster to long photoperiods of high-latitude summers is facilitated by the ls-timeless allele. J. Biol. Rhythms 37, 185–201 (2022).
Google Scholar
Schrider, D. R., Ayroles, J., Matute, D. R. & Kern, A. D. Supervised machine learning reveals introgressed loci in the genomes of Drosophila simulans and D. sechellia. PLoS Genet. 14, e1007341 (2018).
Google Scholar
Li, J. C. & Xu, F. Influences of light-dark shifting on the immune system, tumor growth and life span of rats, mice and fruit flies as well as on the counteraction of melatonin. Biol. Signals 6, 77–89 (1997).
Google Scholar
Emerson, K. J., Bradshaw, W. E. & Holzapfel, C. M. Concordance of the circadian clock with the environment is necessary to maximize fitness in natural populations. Evolution 62, 979–983 (2008).
Google Scholar
Ducatez, S., Sol, D., Sayol, F. & Lefebvre, L. Behavioural plasticity is associated with reduced extinction risk in birds. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 4, 788–793 (2020).
Google Scholar
Menegazzi, P. et al. Adaptation of circadian neuronal network to photoperiod in high-latitude European drosophilids. Curr. Biol. 27, 833–839 (2017).
Google Scholar
Shafer, O. T. et al. Widespread receptivity to neuropeptide PDF throughout the neuronal circadian clock network of Drosophila revealed by real-time cyclic AMP imaging. Neuron 58, 223–237 (2008).
Google Scholar
York, R. A. Assessing the genetic landscape of animal behavior. Genetics 209, 223–232 (2018).
Google Scholar
Ding, K. et al. Imaging neuropeptide release at synapses with a genetically engineered reporter. eLife 8, e46421 (2019).
Google Scholar
Renn, S. C., Park, J. H., Rosbash, M., Hall, J. C. & Taghert, P. H. A pdf neuropeptide gene mutation and ablation of PDF neurons each cause severe abnormalities of behavioral circadian rhythms in Drosophila. Cell 99, 791–802 (1999).
Google Scholar
Duhart, J. M. et al. Circadian structural plasticity drives remodeling of E cell output. Curr. Biol. 30, 5040–5048 (2020).
Google Scholar
Shahandeh, M. P., Pischedda, A. & Turner, T. L. Male mate choice via cuticular hydrocarbon pheromones drives reproductive isolation between Drosophila species. Evolution 72, 123–135 (2018).
Google Scholar
Razafimandimbison, S. G., McDowell, T. D., Halford, D. A. & Bremer, B. Origin of the pantropical and nutriceutical Morinda citrifolia L. (Rubiaceae): comments on its distribution range and circumscription. J. Biogeogr. 37, 520–529 (2010).
Google Scholar
Cook, R. K. et al. The generation of chromosomal deletions to provide extensive coverage and subdivision of the Drosophila melanogaster genome. Genome Biol. 13, R21 (2012).
Google Scholar
Shahandeh, M. P. & Turner, T. L. The complex genetic architecture of male mate choice evolution between Drosophila species. Heredity (Edinb.) 124, 737–750 (2020).
Google Scholar
Zhou, J., Yu, W. & Hardin, P. E. CLOCKWORK ORANGE enhances PERIOD mediated rhythms in transcriptional repression by antagonizing E-box binding by CLOCK-CYCLE. PLoS Genet. 12, e1006430 (2016).
Google Scholar
Chiu, J. C., Low, K. H., Pike, D. H., Yildirim, E. & Edery, I. Assaying locomotor activity to study circadian rhythms and sleep parameters in Drosophila. J. Vis. Exp. 43, 2157 (2010).
Geissmann, Q., Garcia Rodriguez, L., Beckwith, E. J. & Gilestro, G. F. Rethomics: an R framework to analyse high-throughput behavioural data. PLoS ONE 14, e0209331 (2019).
Google Scholar
Long, X., Colonell, J., Wong, A. M., Singer, R. H. & Lionnet, T. Quantitative mRNA imaging throughout the entire Drosophila brain. Nat. Methods 14, 703–706 (2017).
Google Scholar
Yuan, Y., Padilla, M. A., Clark, D. & Yadlapalli, S. Streamlined single-molecule RNA-FISH of core clock mRNAs in clock neurons in whole mount Drosophila brains. Front. Physiol. 13, 1051544 (2022).
Google Scholar
Bahry, E. et al. RS-FISH: precise, interactive, fast, and scalable FISH spot detection. Nat. Methods 19, 1563–1567 (2022).
Google Scholar
Holm, S. A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand. J. Stat. 6, 65–70 (1979).
Google Scholar
Ostrovsky, A., Cachero, S. & Jefferis, G. Clonal analysis of olfaction in Drosophila: immunochemistry and imaging of fly brains. Cold Spring Harb. Protoc. 2013, 342–346 (2013).
Google Scholar
Schindelin, J. et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods 9, 676–682 (2012).
Google Scholar
Ferreira, T. A. et al. Neuronal morphometry directly from bitmap images. Nat. Methods 11, 982–984 (2014).
Google Scholar
Bischof, J., Maeda, R. K., Hediger, M., Karch, F. & Basler, K. An optimized transgenesis system for Drosophila using germ-line-specific phiC31 integrases. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 3312–3317 (2007).
Google Scholar
Markstein, M., Pitsouli, C., Villalta, C., Celniker, S. E. & Perrimon, N. Exploiting position effects and the gypsy retrovirus insulator to engineer precisely expressed transgenes. Nat. Genet. 40, 476–483 (2008).
Google Scholar
Edgar, R. C. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, 1792–1797 (2004).
Google Scholar
Procter, J. B. et al. Alignment of biological sequences with Jalview. Methods Mol. Biol. 2231, 203–224 (2021).
Google Scholar
Schliep, K. P. phangorn: Phylogenetic analysis in R. Bioinformatics 27, 592–593 (2011).
Google Scholar
Therneau, T. M. & Grambsch, P. M. Modelling Survival Data: Extending the Cox Model (Springer, 2000).
Jezovit, J. A., Alwash, N. & Levine, J. D. Using flies to understand social networks. Front. Neural Circuits 15, 755093 (2021).
Google Scholar
Dukas, R. Natural history of social and sexual behavior in fruit flies. Sci. Rep. 10, 21932 (2020).
Google Scholar
Shahandeh, M. Data from: circadian plasticity evolves through regulatory changes in a neuropeptide gene. Dryad https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.vq83bk42z (2024).
Bergland, A. O. et al. Data from: secondary contact and local adaptation contribute to genome-wide patterns of clinal variation in Drosophila melanogaster. Dryad https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.7440s (2015).
