Satellite DNA shapes dictate pericentromere packaging in female meiosis – Nature
Henikoff, S., Ahmad, K. & Malik, H. S. The centromere paradox: stable inheritance with rapidly evolving DNA. Science 293, 1098–1102 (2001).
Google Scholar
Altemose, N. et al. Complete genomic and epigenetic maps of human centromeres. Science 376, eabl4178 (2022).
Google Scholar
Logsdon, G. A. et al. The variation and evolution of complete human centromeres. Nature 629, 136–145 (2024).
Google Scholar
Strauss, F. & Varshavsky, A. A protein binds to a satellite DNA repeat at three specific sites that would be brought into mutual proximity by DNA folding in the nucleosome. Cell 37, 889–901 (1984).
Google Scholar
Vogel, B., Loschberger, A., Sauer, M. & Hock, R. Cross-linking of DNA through HMGA1 suggests a DNA scaffold. Nucleic Acids Res. 39, 7124–7133 (2011).
Google Scholar
Kixmoeller, K., Allu, P. K. & Black, B. E. The centromere comes into focus: from CENP-A nucleosomes to kinetochore connections with the spindle. Open Biol. 10, 200051 (2020).
Google Scholar
Bernard, P. et al. Requirement of heterochromatin for cohesion at centromeres. Science 294, 2539–2542 (2001).
Google Scholar
Folco, H. D., Pidoux, A. L., Urano, T. & Allshire, R. C. Heterochromatin and RNAi are required to establish CENP-A chromatin at centromeres. Science 319, 94–97 (2008).
Google Scholar
Olszak, A. M. et al. Heterochromatin boundaries are hotspots for de novo kinetochore formation. Nat. Cell Biol. 13, 799–808 (2011).
Google Scholar
Jagannathan, M., Cummings, R. & Yamashita, Y. M. A conserved function for pericentromeric satellite DNA. eLife 7, e34122 (2018).
Google Scholar
Nonaka, N. et al. Recruitment of cohesin to heterochromatic regions by Swi6/HP1 in fission yeast. Nat. Cell Biol. 4, 89–93 (2002).
Google Scholar
Kawashima, S. A. et al. Shugoshin enables tension-generating attachment of kinetochores by loading Aurora to centromeres. Genes Dev. 21, 420–435 (2007).
Google Scholar
Eckert, C. A., Gravdahl, D. J. & Megee, P. C. The enhancement of pericentromeric cohesin association by conserved kinetochore components promotes high-fidelity chromosome segregation and is sensitive to microtubule-based tension. Genes Dev. 21, 278–291 (2007).
Google Scholar
Alkan, C. et al. Genome-wide characterization of centromeric satellites from multiple mammalian genomes. Genome Res. 21, 137–145 (2011).
Google Scholar
Arora, U. P., Charlebois, C., Lawal, R. A. & Dumont, B. L. Population and subspecies diversity at mouse centromere satellites. BMC Genomics 22, 279 (2021).
Google Scholar
Jagannathan, M., Warsinger-Pepe, N., Watase, G. J. & Yamashita, Y. M. Comparative analysis of satellite DNA in the Drosophila melanogaster species complex. G3 7, 693–704 (2017).
Google Scholar
Chang, C. H. et al. Islands of retroelements are major components of Drosophila centromeres. PLoS Biol. 17, e3000241 (2019).
Google Scholar
Gambogi, C. W. et al. Centromere innovations within a mouse species. Sci. Adv. 9, eadi5764 (2023).
Google Scholar
DeBose-Scarlett, E. M. & Sullivan, B. A. Genomic and epigenetic foundations of neocentromere formation. Annu. Rev. Genet. 55, 331–348 (2021).
Google Scholar
Guenatri, M., Bailly, D., Maison, C. & Almouzni, G. Mouse centric and pericentric satellite repeats form distinct functional heterochromatin. J. Cell Biol. 166, 493–505 (2004).
Google Scholar
Iwata-Otsubo, A. et al. Expanded satellite repeats amplify a discrete CENP-A nucleosome assembly site on chromosomes that drive in female meiosis. Curr. Biol. 27, 2365–2373 (2017).
Google Scholar
Wong, A. K., Biddle, F. G. & Rattner, J. B. The chromosomal distribution of the major and minor satellite is not conserved in the genus Mus. Chromosoma 99, 190–195 (1990).
Google Scholar
Narayanswami, S. et al. Cytological and molecular characterization of centromeres in Mus domesticus and Mus spretus. Mamm. Genome 2, 186–194 (1992).
Google Scholar
Miyanari, Y., Ziegler-Birling, C. & Torres-Padilla, M. E. Live visualization of chromatin dynamics with fluorescent TALEs. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 20, 1321–1324 (2013).
Google Scholar
Akera, T., Trimm, E. & Lampson, M. A. Molecular strategies of meiotic cheating by selfish centromeres. Cell 178, 1132–1144 (2019).
Google Scholar
El Yakoubi, W. & Akera, T. Condensin dysfunction is a reproductive isolating barrier in mice. Nature 623, 347–355 (2023).
Google Scholar
Masumoto, H., Masukata, H., Muro, Y., Nozaki, N. & Okazaki, T. A human centromere antigen (CENP-B) interacts with a short specific sequence in alphoid DNA, a human centromeric satellite. J. Cell Biol. 109, 1963–1973 (1989).
Google Scholar
Kixmoeller, K., Tarasovetc, E. V., Mer, E., Chang, Y. W. & Black, B. E. Centromeric chromatin clearings demarcate the site of kinetochore formation. Cell (in the press).
Brandle, F., Fruhbauer, B. & Jagannathan, M. Principles and functions of pericentromeric satellite DNA clustering into chromocenters. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 128, 26–39 (2022).
Google Scholar
Matsuda, Y. & Chapman, V. M. In situ analysis of centromeric satellite DNA segregating in Mus species crosses. Mamm. Genome 1, 71–77 (1991).
Google Scholar
Larsen, T. A., Goodsell, D. S., Cascio, D., Grzeskowiak, K. & Dickerson, R. E. The structure of DAPI bound to DNA. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 7, 477–491 (1989).
Google Scholar
Wilson, W. D. et al. Binding of 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) to GC and mixed sequences in DNA: intercalation of a classical groove-binding molecule. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 111, 5008–5010 (1989).
Google Scholar
Wilson, W. D. et al. DNA sequence dependent binding modes of 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI). Biochemistry 29, 8452–8461 (1990).
Google Scholar
Hizver, J., Rozenberg, H., Frolow, F., Rabinovich, D. & Shakked, Z. DNA bending by an adenine–thymine tract and its role in gene regulation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 8490–8495 (2001).
Google Scholar
Rohs, R. et al. The role of DNA shape in protein–DNA recognition. Nature 461, 1248–1253 (2009).
Google Scholar
Joshi, R. et al. Functional specificity of a Hox protein mediated by the recognition of minor groove structure. Cell 131, 530–543 (2007).
Google Scholar
Solomon, M. J., Strauss, F. & Varshavsky, A. A mammalian high mobility group protein recognizes any stretch of six A.T base pairs in duplex DNA. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 83, 1276–1280 (1986).
Google Scholar
Radic, M. Z., Saghbini, M., Elton, T. S., Reeves, R. & Hamkalo, B. A. Hoechst 33258, distamycin A, and high mobility group protein I (HMG-I) compete for binding to mouse satellite DNA. Chromosoma 101, 602–608 (1992).
Google Scholar
Huth, J. R. et al. The solution structure of an HMG-I(Y)–DNA complex defines a new architectural minor groove binding motif. Nat. Struct. Biol. 4, 657–665 (1997).
Google Scholar
Colombo, D. F., Burger, L., Baubec, T. & Schubeler, D. Binding of high mobility group A proteins to the mammalian genome occurs as a function of AT-content. PLoS Genet. 13, e1007102 (2017).
Google Scholar
Vignali, R. & Marracci, S. HMGA genes and proteins in development and evolution. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21, 654 (2020).
Google Scholar
Chiappetta, G. et al. High level expression of the HMGI (Y) gene during embryonic development. Oncogene 13, 2439–2446 (1996).
Google Scholar
Clift, D. et al. A method for the acute and rapid degradation of endogenous proteins. Cell 171, 1692–1706 (2017).
Google Scholar
Federico, A. et al. Hmga1/Hmga2 double knock-out mice display a “superpygmy” phenotype. Biol. Open 3, 372–378 (2014).
Google Scholar
Yoshida, S. et al. Prc1-rich kinetochores are required for error-free acentrosomal spindle bipolarization during meiosis I in mouse oocytes. Nat. Commun. 11, 2652 (2020).
Google Scholar
Schuh, M. & Ellenberg, J. Self-organization of MTOCs replaces centrosome function during acentrosomal spindle assembly in live mouse oocytes. Cell 130, 484–498 (2007).
Google Scholar
Vallot, A. et al. Tension-induced error correction and not kinetochore attachment status activates the SAC in an Aurora-B/C-dependent manner in oocytes. Curr. Biol. 28, 130–139 (2018).
Google Scholar
Chmatal, L., Yang, K., Schultz, R. M. & Lampson, M. A. Spatial regulation of kinetochore microtubule attachments by destabilization at spindle poles in meiosis I. Curr. Biol. 25, 1835–1841 (2015).
Google Scholar
Brunet, S. et al. Kinetochore fibers are not involved in the formation of the first meiotic spindle in mouse oocytes, but control the exit from the first meiotic M phase. J. Cell Biol. 146, 1–12 (1999).
Google Scholar
Kitajima, T. S., Ohsugi, M. & Ellenberg, J. Complete kinetochore tracking reveals error-prone homologous chromosome biorientation in mammalian oocytes. Cell 146, 568–581 (2011).
Google Scholar
Amor, D. J., Kalitsis, P., Sumer, H. & Choo, K. H. Building the centromere: from foundation proteins to 3D organization. Trends Cell Biol. 14, 359–368 (2004).
Google Scholar
Vermaak, D. & Malik, H. S. Multiple roles for heterochromatin protein 1 genes in Drosophila. Annu. Rev. Genet. 43, 467–492 (2009).
Google Scholar
Risteski, P., Jagric, M., Pavin, N. & Tolic, I. M. Biomechanics of chromosome alignment at the spindle midplane. Curr. Biol. 31, R574–R585 (2021).
Google Scholar
Ye, A. A. et al. Aurora A kinase contributes to a pole-based error correction pathway. Curr. Biol. 25, 1842–1851 (2015).
Google Scholar
Lampson, M. A. & Grishchuk, E. L. Mechanisms to avoid and correct erroneous kinetochore-microtubule attachments. Biology 6, 1 (2017).
Google Scholar
Fry, K. & Salser, W. Nucleotide sequences of HS-α satellite DNA from kangaroo rat Dipodomys ordii and characterization of similar sequences in other rodents. Cell 12, 1069–1084 (1977).
Google Scholar
Plohl, M., Mestrovic, N., Bruvo, B. & Ugarkovic, D. Similarity of structural features and evolution of satellite DNAs from Palorus subdepressus (Coleoptera) and related species. J. Mol. Evol. 46, 234–239 (1998).
Google Scholar
Plohl, M., Luchetti, A., Mestrovic, N. & Mantovani, B. Satellite DNAs between selfishness and functionality: structure, genomics and evolution of tandem repeats in centromeric (hetero)chromatin. Gene 409, 72–82 (2008).
Google Scholar
Melters, D. P. et al. Comparative analysis of tandem repeats from hundreds of species reveals unique insights into centromere evolution. Genome Biol. 14, R10 (2013).
Google Scholar
Parker, S. C., Hansen, L., Abaan, H. O., Tullius, T. D. & Margulies, E. H. Local DNA topography correlates with functional noncoding regions of the human genome. Science 324, 389–392 (2009).
Google Scholar
Brand, C. L. & Levine, M. T. Functional diversification of chromatin on rapid evolutionary timescales. Annu. Rev. Genet. 55, 401–425 (2021).
Google Scholar
Postnikov, Y. V. & Bustin, M. Functional interplay between histone H1 and HMG proteins in chromatin. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1859, 462–467 (2016).
Google Scholar
Chardon, F. et al. CENP-B-mediated DNA loops regulate activity and stability of human centromeres. Mol. Cell 82, 1751–1767 (2022).
Google Scholar
Jagannathan, M. & Yamashita, Y. M. Defective satellite DNA clustering into chromocenters underlies hybrid incompatibility in Drosophila. Mol. Biol. Evol. 38, 4977–4986 (2021).
Google Scholar
Foti, D. et al. Lack of the architectural factor HMGA1 causes insulin resistance and diabetes in humans and mice. Nat. Med. 11, 765–773 (2005).
Google Scholar
Mestrovic, N., Plohl, M., Mravinac, B. & Ugarkovic, D. Evolution of satellite DNAs from the genus Palorus–experimental evidence for the “library” hypothesis. Mol. Biol. Evol. 15, 1062–1068 (1998).
Google Scholar
Hasson, D. et al. The octamer is the major form of CENP-A nucleosomes at human centromeres. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 20, 687–695 (2013).
Google Scholar
Wong, A. K. & Rattner, J. B. Sequence organization and cytological localization of the minor satellite of mouse. Nucleic Acids Res. 16, 11645–11661 (1988).
Google Scholar
Horz, W. & Altenburger, W. Nucleotide sequence of mouse satellite DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 9, 683–696 (1981).
Google Scholar
Packiaraj, J. & Thakur, J. DNA satellite and chromatin organization at mouse centromeres and pericentromeres. Genome Biol. 25, 52 (2024).
Google Scholar
Langmead, B. & Salzberg, S. L. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. Methods 9, 357–359 (2012).
Google Scholar
Hon, T. et al. Highly accurate long-read HiFi sequencing data for five complex genomes. Sci. Data 7, 399 (2020).
Google Scholar
Schindelin, J. et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods 9, 676–682 (2012).
Google Scholar
Kumon, T. et al. Parallel pathways for recruiting effector proteins determine centromere drive and suppression. Cell 184, 4904–4918 (2021).
Google Scholar
Clift, D., So, C., McEwan, W. A., James, L. C. & Schuh, M. Acute and rapid degradation of endogenous proteins by Trim-Away. Nat. Protoc. 13, 2149–2175 (2018).
Google Scholar
Grenfell, A. W. et al. A versatile multivariate image analysis pipeline reveals features of Xenopus extract spindles. J. Cell Biol. 213, 127–136 (2016).
Google Scholar
Dudka, D., Akins, R. B. & Lampson, M. A. FREEDA: an automated computational pipeline guides experimental testing of protein innovation. J. Cell Biol. 222, e202212084 (2023).
Google Scholar
