The RAD52 double-ring remodels replication forks restricting fork reversal – Nature
Bhat, D. S., Spies, M. A. & Spies, M. A moving target for drug discovery: structure activity relationship and many genome (de)stabilizing functions of the RAD52 protein. DNA Repair 120, 103421 (2022).
Google Scholar
Malacaria, E., Honda, M., Franchitto, A., Spies, M. & Pichierri, P. Physiological and pathological roles of RAD52 at DNA replication forks. Cancers 12, 402 (2020).
Malacaria, E. et al. Rad52 prevents excessive replication fork reversal and protects from nascent strand degradation. Nat. Commun. 10, 1412 (2019).
Google Scholar
Murfuni, I. et al. Survival of the replication checkpoint deficient cells requires MUS81-RAD52 function. PLoS Genet. 9, e1003910 (2013).
Google Scholar
Yeeles, J. T., Poli, J., Marians, K. J. & Pasero, P. Rescuing stalled or damaged replication forks. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 5, a012815 (2013).
Google Scholar
Quinet, A., Lemacon, D. & Vindigni, A. Replication fork reversal: players and guardians. Mol. Cell 68, 830–833 (2017).
Google Scholar
Kondratick, C. M., Washington, M. T. & Spies, M. Making choices: DNA replication fork recovery mechanisms. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 113, 27–37 (2021).
Google Scholar
Carley, A. C. et al. Replication protein A phosphorylation facilitates RAD52-dependent homologous recombination in BRCA-deficient cells. Mol. Cell. Biol. 42, e0052421 (2022).
Google Scholar
Stark, J. M., Pierce, A. J., Oh, J., Pastink, A. & Jasin, M. Genetic steps of mammalian homologous repair with distinct mutagenic consequences. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24, 9305–9316 (2004).
Google Scholar
Llorens-Agost, M. et al. POLθ-mediated end joining is restricted by RAD52 and BRCA2 until the onset of mitosis. Nat. Cell Biol. 23, 1095–1104 (2021).
Google Scholar
Mijic, S. et al. Replication fork reversal triggers fork degradation in BRCA2-defective cells. Nat. Commun. 8, 859 (2017).
Google Scholar
Bhowmick, R., Minocherhomji, S. & Hickson, I. D. RAD52 facilitates mitotic DNA synthesis following replication stress. Mol. Cell 64, 1117–1126 (2016).
Google Scholar
Sotiriou, S. K. et al. Mammalian RAD52 functions in break-induced replication repair of collapsed DNA replication forks. Mol. Cell 64, 1127–1134 (2016).
Google Scholar
Cong, K. et al. Replication gaps are a key determinant of PARP inhibitor synthetic lethality with BRCA deficiency. Mol. Cell 81, 3128–3144.e3127 (2021).
Google Scholar
Hanamshet, K., Mazina, O. M. & Mazin, A. V. Reappearance from obscurity: mammalian Rad52 in homologous recombination. Genes 7, 63 (2016).
Grimme, J. M. et al. Human Rad52 binds and wraps single-stranded DNA and mediates annealing via two hRad52-ssDNA complexes. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, 2917–2930 (2010).
Google Scholar
Grimme, J. M. & Spies, M. FRET-based assays to monitor DNA binding and annealing by Rad52 recombination mediator protein. Methods Mol. Biol. 745, 463–483 (2011).
Google Scholar
Kagawa, W. et al. Identification of a second DNA binding site in the human Rad52 protein. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 24264–24273 (2008).
Google Scholar
Lloyd, J. A., McGrew, D. A. & Knight, K. L. Identification of residues important for DNA binding in the full-length human Rad52 protein. J. Mol. Biol. 345, 239–249 (2005).
Google Scholar
Saotome, M. et al. Structural basis of homology-directed DNA repair mediated by RAD52. iScience 3, 50–62 (2018).
Google Scholar
Mazina, O. M., Keskin, H., Hanamshet, K., Storici, F. & Mazin, A. V. Rad52 inverse strand exchange drives RNA-templated DNA double-strand break repair. Mol. Cell 67, 19–29.e13 (2017).
Google Scholar
Bhat, D. S. et al. Therapeutic disruption of RAD52-ssDNA complexation via novel drug-like inhibitors. NAR Cancer 5, zcad018 (2023).
Google Scholar
Hengel, S. R. et al. Small-molecule inhibitors identify the RAD52-ssDNA interaction as critical for recovery from replication stress and for survival of BRCA2 deficient cells. eLife 5, e14740 (2016).
Google Scholar
Asor, R. & Kukura, P. Characterising biomolecular interactions and dynamics with mass photometry. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 68, 102132 (2022).
Google Scholar
Young, G. & Kukura, P. Interferometric scattering microscopy. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 70, 301–322 (2019).
Google Scholar
Balboni, B. et al. An integrative structural study of the human full-length RAD52 at 2.2 Å resolution. Commun. Biol. 7, 956 (2024).
Kagawa, W. et al. Crystal structure of the homologous-pairing domain from the human Rad52 recombinase in the undecameric form. Mol. Cell 10, 359–371 (2002).
Google Scholar
Kinoshita, C. et al. The cryo-EM structure of full-length RAD52 protein contains an undecameric ring. FEBS Open Bio 13, 408–418 (2023).
Google Scholar
Singleton, M. R., Wentzell, L. M., Liu, Y., West, S. C. & Wigley, D. B. Structure of the single-strand annealing domain of human RAD52 protein. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 13492–13497 (2002).
Google Scholar
Labute, P. LowModeMD—implicit low-mode velocity filtering applied to conformational search of macrocycles and protein loops. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 50, 792–800 (2010).
Google Scholar
Cramer-Morales, K. et al. Personalized synthetic lethality induced by targeting RAD52 in leukemias identified by gene mutation and expression profile. Blood 122, 1293–1304 (2013).
Google Scholar
Lok, B. H., Carley, A. C., Tchang, B. & Powell, S. N. RAD52 inactivation is synthetically lethal with deficiencies in BRCA1 and PALB2 in addition to BRCA2 through RAD51-mediated homologous recombination. Oncogene 32, 3552–3558 (2013).
Google Scholar
Feng, Z. et al. Rad52 inactivation is synthetically lethal with BRCA2 deficiency. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 686–691 (2011).
Google Scholar
Rossi, M. J., DiDomenico, S. F., Patel, M. & Mazin, A. V. RAD52: paradigm of synthetic lethality and new developments. Front. Genet. 12, 780293 (2021).
Google Scholar
Chandramouly, G. et al. Small-molecule disruption of RAD52 rings as a mechanism for precision medicine in BRCA-deficient cancers. Chem. Biol. 22, 1491–1504 (2015).
Google Scholar
Sullivan, K. et al. Identification of a small molecule inhibitor of RAD52 by structure-based selection. PLoS ONE 11, e0147230 (2016).
Google Scholar
Huang, F. et al. Targeting BRCA1- and BRCA2-deficient cells with RAD52 small molecule inhibitors. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, 4189–4199 (2016).
Google Scholar
Hengel, S. R., Spies, M. A. & Spies, M. Small-molecule inhibitors targeting DNA repair and DNA repair deficiency in research and cancer therapy. Cell Chem. Biol. 24, 1101–1119 (2017).
Google Scholar
Stasiak, A. Z. et al. The human Rad52 protein exists as a heptameric ring. Curr. Biol. 10, 337–340 (2000).
Google Scholar
Liang, C. C. et al. Mechanism of single-stranded DNA annealing by RAD52-RPA complex. Nature 629, 697–703 (2024).
Google Scholar
Deveryshetty, J. et al. Homodecameric Rad52 promotes single-position Rad51 nucleation in homologous recombination. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.02.05.527205 (2023).
Honda, M., Okuno, Y., Yoo, J., Ha, T. & Spies, M. Tyrosine phosphorylation enhances RAD52-mediated annealing by modulating its DNA binding. EMBO J. 30, 3368–3382 (2011).
Google Scholar
Rothenberg, E., Grimme, J. M., Spies, M. & Ha, T. Human Rad52-mediated homology search and annealing occurs by continuous interactions between overlapping nucleoprotein complexes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 20274–20279 (2008).
Google Scholar
Kyriukha, Y. et al. The PALB2 DNA-binding domain is an intrinsically disordered recombinase. Preprint at Research Square https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3235465/v1 (2023).
Deveryshetty, J. et al. Novel RNA and DNA strand exchange activity of the PALB2 DNA binding domain and its critical role for DNA repair in cells. eLife 8, e44063 (2019).
Google Scholar
Henricksen, L. A., Umbricht, C. B. & Wold, M. S. Recombinant replication protein A: expression, complex formation, and functional characterization. J. Biol. Chem. 269, 11121–11132 (1994).
Google Scholar
Bétous, R. et al. Substrate-selective repair and restart of replication forks by DNA translocases. Cell Rep. 3, 1958–1969 (2013).
Google Scholar
Ling, J. A. et al. Fork-remodeling helicase Rad5 preferentially reverses replication forks with gaps in the leading strand. J. Mol. Biol. 435, 167946 (2023).
Google Scholar
Subramanyam, S., Kinz-Thompson, C. D., Gonzalez, R. L. Jr. & Spies, M. Observation and analysis of RAD51 nucleation dynamics at single-monomer resolution. Methods Enzymol. 600, 201–232 (2018).
Google Scholar
Punjani, A., Rubinstein, J. L., Fleet, D. J. & Brubaker, M. A. cryoSPARC: algorithms for rapid unsupervised cryo-EM structure determination. Nat. Methods 14, 290–296 (2017).
Google Scholar
Afonine, P. V. et al. Real-space refinement in PHENIX for cryo-EM and crystallography. Acta Crystallogr. D Struct. Biol. 74, 531–544 (2018).
Google Scholar
Emsley, P., Lohkamp, B., Scott, W. G. & Cowtan, K. Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 486–501 (2010).
Google Scholar
Sanchez-Garcia, R. et al. DeepEMhancer: a deep learning solution for cryo-EM volume post-processing. Commun. Biol. 4, 874 (2021).
Google Scholar
Afonine, P. V. et al. New tools for the analysis and validation of cryo-EM maps and atomic models. Acta Crystallogr. D Struct. Biol. 74, 814–840 (2018).
Google Scholar
Morin, A. et al. Collaboration gets the most out of software. eLife 2, e01456 (2013).
Google Scholar
Krieger, E., Darden, T., Nabuurs, S. B., Finkelstein, A. & Vriend, G. Making optimal use of empirical energy functions: force-field parameterization in crystal space. Proteins 57, 678–683 (2004).
Google Scholar
Krieger, E. & Vriend, G. New ways to boost molecular dynamics simulations. J. Comput. Chem. 36, 996–1007 (2015).
Google Scholar
Dean, S. F., Whalen, K. L. & Spies, M. A. Biosynthesis of a novel glutamate racemase containing a site-specific 7-hydroxycoumarin amino acid: enzyme-ligand promiscuity revealed at the atomistic level. ACS Cent. Sci. 1, 364–373 (2015).
Google Scholar
Subramanyam, S., Jones, W. T., Spies, M. & Spies, M. A. Contributions of the RAD51 N-terminal domain to BRCA2-RAD51 interaction. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, 9020–9032 (2013).
Google Scholar
Whelan, D. R. & Rothenberg, E. Super-resolution mapping of cellular double-strand break resection complexes during homologous recombination. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2021963118 (2021).
