A robustly rooted tree of eukaryotes reveals their excavate ancestry – Nature
Burki, F., Roger, A. J., Brown, M. W. & Simpson, A. G. B. The new tree of eukaryotes. Trends Ecol. Evol. 35, 43–55 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2019.08.008 (2020).
Tikhonenkov, D. V. et al. Microbial predators form a new supergroup of eukaryotes. Nature 612, 714–719 (2022).
Google Scholar
Eme, L., Sharpe, S. C., Brown, M. W. & Roger, A. J. On the age of eukaryotes: evaluating evidence from fossils and molecular clocks. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 6, a016139 (2014).
Google Scholar
Betts, H. C. et al. Integrated genomic and fossil evidence illuminates life’s early evolution and eukaryote origin. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 1556–1562 (2018).
Google Scholar
Strassert, J. F. H., Irisarri, I., Williams, T. A. & Burki, F. A molecular timescale for eukaryote evolution with implications for the origin of red algal-derived plastids. Nat. Commun. 12, 1879 (2021).
Google Scholar
Katz, L. A., Grant, J. R., Parfrey, L. W. & Burleigh, J. G. Turning the crown upside down: gene tree parsimony roots the eukaryotic tree of life. Syst. Biol. 61, 653–660 (2012).
Google Scholar
Cerón-Romero, M. A., Fonseca, M. M., De Oliveira Martins, L., Posada, D. & Katz, L. A. Phylogenomic analyses of 2,786 genes in 158 lineages support a root of the eukaryotic tree of life between Opisthokonts and all other lineages. Genome Biol. Evol. 14, evac119 (2022).
Google Scholar
Cavalier-Smith, T. Kingdoms Protozoa and Chromista and the eozoan root of the eukaryotic tree. Biol. Lett. 6, 342–345 (2010).
Google Scholar
Stechmann, A. & Cavalier-Smith, T. Rooting the eukaryote tree by using a derived gene fusion. Science 297, 89–91 (2002).
Google Scholar
Richards, T. A. & Cavalier-Smith, T. Myosin domain evolution and the primary divergence of eukaryotes. Nature 436, 1113–1118 (2005).
Google Scholar
Rogozin, I. B., Basu, M. K., Csürös, M. & Koonin, E. V. Analysis of rare genomic changes does not support the Unikont–Bikont phylogeny and suggests cyanobacterial symbiosis as the point of primary radiation of eukaryotes. Genome Biol. Evol. 1, 99–113 (2009).
Google Scholar
Leonard, G. & Richards, T. A. Genome-scale comparative analysis of gene fusions, genefissions, and the fungal tree of life. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 21402–21407 (2012).
Google Scholar
Vosseberg, J. et al. Timing the origin of eukaryotic cellular complexity with ancient duplications. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 5, 92–100 (2021).
Google Scholar
Eme, L. et al. Inference and reconstruction of the heimdallarchaeial ancestry of eukaryotes. Nature 618, 992–999 (2023).
Google Scholar
Pittis, A. A. & Gabaldón, T. Late acquisition of mitochondria by a host with chimaeric prokaryotic ancestry. Nature 531, 101–104 (2016).
Google Scholar
Roger, A. J., Muñoz-Gómez, S. A. & Kamikawa, R. The origin and diversification of mitochondria. Curr. Biol. 27, R1177–R1192 (2017).
Muñoz-Gómez, S. A. et al. Site-and-branch-heterogeneous analyses of an expanded dataset favour mitochondria as sister to known Alphaproteobacteria. Nat. Ecol. Evolution 6, 253–262 (2022).
Google Scholar
Al Jewari, C. & Baldauf, S. L. An excavate root for the eukaryote Tree of Life. Sci. Adv. 9, eade4973 (2023).
Google Scholar
Derelle, R. & Lang, B. F. Rooting the eukaryotic tree with mitochondrial and bacterial proteins. Mol. Biol. Evol. 29, 1277–1289 (2012).
Google Scholar
Derelle, R. et al. Bacterial proteins pinpoint a single eukaryotic root. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, E693–E699 (2015).
Google Scholar
He, D., Fiz-Palacios, O., Fu, C. J., Tsai, C. C. & Baldauf, S. L. An alternative root for the eukaryote Tree of Life. Curr. Biol. 24, 465–470 (2014).
Google Scholar
Al Jewari, C. & Baldauf, S. L. Conflict over the eukaryote root resides in strong outliers, mosaics and missing data sensitivity of site-specific (CAT) mixture models. Syst. Biol. 0, 1–16 (2022).
Google Scholar
Lax, G. et al. Hemimastigophora is a novel supra-kingdom-level lineage of eukaryotes. Nature 564, 410–414 (2018).
Kapli, P., Yang, Z. & Telford, M. J. Phylogenetic tree building in the genomic age. Nat. Rev. Genet. 21, 428–444 (2020).
Google Scholar
Susko, E., Lincker, L. & Roger, A. J. Accelerated estimation of frequency classes in site-heterogeneous profile mixture models. Mol. Biol. Evol. 35, 1266–1283 (2018).
Google Scholar
Crotty, S. M. et al. GHOST: recovering historical signal from heterotachously evolved sequence alignments. Syst. Biol. 69, 249–264 (2019).
Gaston, D., Susko, E. & Roger, A. J. A phylogenetic mixture model for the identification of functionally divergent protein residues. Bioinformatics 27, 2655–2663 (2011).
Google Scholar
Quang, L. S., Gascuel, O. & Lartillot, N. Empirical profile mixture models for phylogenetic reconstruction. Bioinformatics 24, 2317–2323 (2008).
Google Scholar
Szánthó, L. L., Lartillot, N., Szöllősi, G. J. & Schrempf, D. Compositionally constrained sites drive long-branch attraction. Syst. Biol. https://doi.org/10.1093/SYSBIO/SYAD013 (2023).
Jerlström-Hultqvist, J. et al. A unique symbiosome in an anaerobic single-celled eukaryote. Nat. Commun. 15, 9726 (2024).
Baños, H., Susko, E. & Roger, A. J. Is over-parameterization a problem for profile mixture models? Syst. Biol. https://doi.org/10.1093/SYSBIO/SYAD063 (2023).
Brown, M. W. et al. Phylogenomics places orphan protistan lineages in a novel eukaryotic super-group. Genome Biol. Evol. 10, 427–433 (2018).
Google Scholar
Strassert, J. F. H., Jamy, M., Mylnikov, A. P., Tikhonenkov, D. V. & Burki, F. New phylogenomic analysis of the enigmatic phylum Telonemia further resolves the eukaryote Tree of Life. Mol. Biol. Evol. 36, 757 (2019).
Google Scholar
Williamson, K. et al. A robustly rooted tree of eukaryotes reveals their excavate ancestry [Data]. Figshare https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.26863594.v1 (2025).
Cavalier-Smith, T. Ciliary transition zone evolution and the root of the eukaryote tree: implications for opisthokont origin and classification of kingdoms Protozoa, Plantae, and Fungi. Protoplasma 259, 487–593 (2022).
Google Scholar
Cavalier-Smith, T. & Chao, E. E. Y. Multidomain ribosomal protein trees and the planctobacterial origin of neomura (eukaryotes, archaebacteria). Protoplasma 257, 621–753 (2020).
Google Scholar
Baker, B. A. et al. Expanded phylogeny of extremely halophilic archaea shows multiple independent adaptations to hypersaline environments. Nat. Microbiol. 9, 964–975 (2024).
Susko, E. Tests for two trees using likelihood methods. Mol. Biol. Evol. 31, 1029–1039 (2014).
Google Scholar
Markowski, E. & Susko, E. Performance of topology tests under extreme selection bias. Mol. Biol. Evol. 41, msad280 (2024).
Google Scholar
Heiss, A. A. et al. Combined morphological and phylogenomic re-examination of malawimonads, a critical taxon for inferring the evolutionary history of eukaryotes. R. Soc. Open Sci. 5, 171707 (2018).
Google Scholar
Susko, E. & Roger, A. J. Long branch attraction biases in phylogenetics. Syst. Biol. 70, 838–843 (2021).
Google Scholar
Kapli, P. & Telford, M. J. Topology-dependent asymmetry in systematic errors affects phylogenetic placement of Ctenophora and Xenacoelomorpha. Sci. Adv. 6, 5162–5173 (2020).
Google Scholar
Inagaki, Y., Susko, E., Fast, N. M. & Roger, A. J. Covarion shifts cause a long-branch attraction artifact that unites Microsporidia and Archaebacteria in EF-1α phylogenies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21, 1340–1349 (2004).
Google Scholar
Eglit, Y. et al. Meteora sporadica, a protist with incredible cell architecture, is related to Hemimastigophora. Curr. Biol. 34, 451–459.e6 (2024).
Google Scholar
Yubuki, N. & Leander, B. S. Evolution of microtubule organizing centers across the tree of eukaryotes. Plant J. 75, 230–244 (2013).
Google Scholar
Heiss, A. A., Walker, G. & Simpson, A. G. B. The microtubular cytoskeleton of the apusomonad Thecamonas, a sister lineage to the opisthokonts. Protist 164, 598–621 (2013).
Google Scholar
Suzuki-Tellier, S., Kiørboe, T. & Simpson, A. G. B. The function of the feeding groove of ‘typical excavate’ flagellates. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 71, e13016 (2024).
Google Scholar
Takishita, K. et al. Multigene phylogenies of diverse carpediemonas-like organisms identify the closest relatives of ‘amitochondriate’ diplomonads and retortamonads. Protist 163, 344–355 (2012).
Google Scholar
Leger, M. M. et al. Organelles that illuminate the origins of Trichomonas hydrogenosomes and Giardia mitosomes. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 0092 (2017).
Google Scholar
Heiss, A. A., Walker, G. & Simpson, A. G. B. The ultrastructure of ancyromonas, a eukaryote without supergroup affinities. Protist 162, 373–393 (2011).
Google Scholar
Brugerolle, G. Description of a new freshwater heterotrophic flagellate Sulcomonas lacustris affiliated to the collodictyonids. Acta Protozool. 45, 175–182 (2006).
Brugerolle, G., Bricheux, G., Philippe, H. & Coffe, G. Collodictyon triciliatum and Diphylleia rotans (=Aulacomonas submarina) form a new family of flagellates (Collodictyonidae) with tubular mitochondrial cristae that is phylogenetically distant from other flagellate groups. Protist 153, 59–70 (2002).
Google Scholar
Tikhonenkov, D. V. et al. Description of Colponema vietnamica sp.n. and Acavomonas peruviana n. gen. n. sp., two new alveolate Phyla (Colponemidia nom. nov. and Acavomonidia nom. nov.) and their contributions to reconstructing the ancestral state of alveolates and eukaryotes. PLoS ONE 9, e95467 (2014).
Google Scholar
Janouškovec, J. et al. A new lineage of eukaryotes illuminates early mitochondrial genome reduction. Curr. Biol. 27, 3717–3724.e5 (2017).
Google Scholar
Leander, B. S. Eukaryotic evolution: deep phylogeny does not imply morphological novelty. Curr. Biol. 33, R112–R114 (2023).
Google Scholar
Cavalier-Smith, T. Early evolution of eukaryote feeding modes, cell structural diversity, and classification of the protozoan phyla Loukozoa, Sulcozoa, and Choanozoa. Eur. J. Protistol. 49, 115–178 (2013).
Google Scholar
Tice, A. K. et al. PhyloFisher: a phylogenomic package for resolving eukaryotic relationships. PLoS Biol. 19, e3001365 (2021).
Google Scholar
Buchfink, B., Reuter, K. & Drost, H. G. Sensitive protein alignments at tree-of-life scale using DIAMOND. Nat. Methods 18, 366–368 (2021).
Google Scholar
Fu, L., Niu, B., Zhu, Z., Wu, S. & Li, W. CD-HIT: accelerated for clustering the next-generation sequencing data. Bioinformatics 28, 3150 (2012).
Google Scholar
Katoh, K. & Standley, D. M. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30, 772–780 (2013).
Google Scholar
Capella-Gutierrez, S., Silla-Martinez, J. M. & Gabaldon, T. trimAl: a tool for automated alignment trimming in large-scale phylogenetic analyses. Bioinformatics 25, 1972–1973 (2009).
Google Scholar
Criscuolo, A. & Gribaldo, S. BMGE (block mapping and gathering with entropy): a new software for selection of phylogenetic informative regions from multiple sequence alignments. BMC Evol. Biol. 10, 210 (2010).
Google Scholar
Minh, B. Q. et al. IQ-TREE 2: new models and efficient methods for phylogenetic inference in the genomic era. Mol. Biol. Evol. 37, 1530–1534 (2020).
Google Scholar
Hoang, D. T., Chernomor, O., Von Haeseler, A., Minh, B. Q. & Vinh, L. S. UFBoot2: improving the ultrafast bootstrap approximation. Mol. Biol. Evol. 35, 518–522 (2018).
Google Scholar
Tukey, J. W. Exploratory Data Analysis (Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1977).
Nguyen, L. T., Schmidt, H. A., Von Haeseler, A. & Minh, B. Q. IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 32, 268 (2015).
Google Scholar
Menardo, F. et al. Treemmer: a tool to reduce large phylogenetic datasets with minimal loss of diversity. BMC Bioinf. 19, 164 (2018).
Google Scholar
Susko, E. & Roger, A. J. On the use of information criteria for model selection in phylogenetics. Mol. Biol. Evol. 37, 549–562 (2020).
Google Scholar
Lartillot, N., Lepage, T. & Blanquart, S. PhyloBayes 3: a Bayesian software package for phylogenetic reconstruction and molecular dating. Bioinformatics 25, 2286–2288 (2009).
Google Scholar
Guindon, S. et al. New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Syst. Biol. 59, 307–321 (2010).
Google Scholar
Reynolds, D. in Encyclopedia of Biometrics (ed. Li, S. Z.) 659–663 (Springer, 2009).
Brown, M. Data associated with PhyloFisher. Figshare https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.15141900.v1 (2021).
