Diverse anti-defence systems are encoded in the leading region of plasmids – Nature
von Wintersdorff, C. J. H. et al. Dissemination of antimicrobial resistance in microbial ecosystems through horizontal gene transfer. Front. Microbiol. 7, 173 (2016).
Carattoli, A. Plasmids and the spread of resistance. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 303, 298–304 (2013).
Google Scholar
Doron, S. et al. Systematic discovery of antiphage defense systems in the microbial pangenome. Science 359, eaar4120 (2018).
Google Scholar
Getino, M. & de la Cruz, F. Natural and artificial strategies to control the conjugative transmission of plasmids. Microbiol. Spectr. https://doi.org/10.1128/microbiolspec.mtbp-0015-2016 (2018).
Gophna, U. et al. No evidence of inhibition of horizontal gene transfer by CRISPR–Cas on evolutionary timescales. ISME J. 9, 2021–2027 (2015).
Google Scholar
Masai, H. & Arai, K. Frpo: a novel single-stranded DNA promoter for transcription and for primer RNA synthesis of DNA replication. Cell 89, 897–907 (1997).
Google Scholar
Rodríguez-Beltrán, J., DelaFuente, J., León-Sampedro, R., MacLean, R. C. & San Millán, Á. Beyond horizontal gene transfer: the role of plasmids in bacterial evolution. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-020-00497-1 (2021).
Guglielmini, J., de la Cruz, F. & Rocha, E. P. C. Evolution of conjugation and type IV secretion systems. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30, 315–331 (2013).
Google Scholar
Smillie, C., Garcillán-Barcia, M. P., Francia, M. V., Rocha, E. P. C. & de la Cruz, F. Mobility of plasmids. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 74, 434–452 (2010).
Google Scholar
Ares-Arroyo, M., Nucci, A. & Rocha, E. P. C. Identification of novel origins of transfer across bacterial plasmids. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.30.577996 (2024).
Ramsay, J. P. & Firth, N. Diverse mobilization strategies facilitate transfer of non-conjugative mobile genetic elements. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 38, 1–9 (2017).
Google Scholar
Ares-Arroyo, M., Coluzzi, C. & Rocha, E. P. C. Origins of transfer establish networks of functional dependencies for plasmid transfer by conjugation. Nucleic Acids Res. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkac1079 (2022).
De La Cruz, F., Frost, L. S., Meyer, R. J. & Zechner, E. L. Conjugative DNA metabolism in Gram-negative bacteria. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 34, 18–40 (2010).
Google Scholar
Westra, E. R. et al. CRISPR-Cas systems preferentially target the leading regions of MOBF conjugative plasmids. RNA Biol. 10, 749–761 (2013).
Google Scholar
Venturini, C. et al. Sequences of two related multiple antibiotic resistance virulence plasmids sharing a unique IS26-related molecular signature isolated from different Escherichia coli pathotypes from different hosts. PLoS ONE 8, e78862 (2013).
Google Scholar
Takahashi, H., Shao, M., Furuya, N. & Komano, T. The genome sequence of the incompatibility group Iγ plasmid R621a: evolution of IncI plasmids. Plasmid 66, 112–121 (2011).
Google Scholar
Bates, S., Roscoe, R. A., Althorpe, N. J., Brammar, W. J. & Wilkins, B. M. Y. Expression of leading region genes on IncI1 plasmid ColIb-P9: genetic evidence for single-stranded DNA transcription. Microbiology 145, 2655–2662 (1999).
Google Scholar
Althorpe, N. J., Chilley, P. M., Thomas, A. T., Brammar, W. J. & Wilkins, B. M. Transient transcriptional activation of the IncI1 plasmid anti-restriction gene (ardA) and SOS inhibition gene (psiB) early in conjugating recipient bacteria. Mol. Microbiol. 31, 133–142 (1999).
Google Scholar
Miyakoshi, M., Ohtsubo, Y., Nagata, Y. & Tsuda, M. Transcriptome analysis of zygotic induction during conjugative transfer of plasmid RP4. Front. Microbiol. 11, 1125 (2020).
Google Scholar
Couturier, A. et al. Real-time visualisation of the intracellular dynamics of conjugative plasmid transfer. Nat. Commun. 14, 294 (2023).
Google Scholar
Bernheim, A. & Sorek, R. The pan-immune system of bacteria: antiviral defence as a community resource. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 18, 113–119 (2020).
Google Scholar
Borges, A. L., Davidson, A. R. & Bondy-Denomy, J. The discovery, mechanisms, and evolutionary impact of anti-CRISPRs. Annu. Rev. Virol. 4, 37–59 (2017).
Google Scholar
Goryanin, I. I. et al. Antirestriction activities of KlcA (RP4) and ArdB (R64) proteins. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsle/fny227 (2018).
Read, T. D., Thomas, A. T. & Wilkins, B. M. Evasion of type I and type II DNA restriction systems by Incl1 plasmid Collb-P9 during transfer by bacterial conjugation. Mol. Microbiol. 6, 1933–1941 (1992).
Google Scholar
Jones, A. L., Barth, P. T. & Wilkins, B. M. Zygotic induction of plasmid ssb and psiB genes following conjugative transfer of Incl1 plasmid Collb-P9. Mol. Microbiol. 6, 605–613 (1992).
Google Scholar
Virolle, C., Goldlust, K., Djermoun, S., Bigot, S. & Lesterlin, C. Plasmid transfer by conjugation in Gram-negative bacteria: from the cellular to the community level. Genes 11, 1239 (2020).
Google Scholar
Garcillán-Barcia, M. P., Alvarado, A. & de la Cruz, F. Identification of bacterial plasmids based on mobility and plasmid population biology. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 35, 936–956 (2011).
Google Scholar
Fraikin, N., Couturier, A. & Lesterlin, C. The winding journey of conjugative plasmids toward a novel host cell. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 78, 102449 (2024).
Google Scholar
Stanley, S. Y. et al. Anti-CRISPR-associated proteins are crucial repressors of anti-CRISPR transcription. Cell 178, 1452–1464.e13 (2019).
Google Scholar
Studier, F. W. Gene 0.3 of bacteriophage T7 acts to overcome the DNA restriction system of the host. J. Mol. Biol. 94, 283–295 (1975).
Google Scholar
Zavilgelsky, G. B., Kotova, V. Y. & Rastorguev, S. M. Antimodification activity of the ArdA and Ocr proteins. Russ. J. Genet. 47, 139–146 (2011).
Google Scholar
Fernández-López, C. et al. Mobilizable rolling-circle replicating plasmids from Gram-positive bacteria: a low-cost conjugative transfer. Microbiol. Spectr. https://doi.org/10.1128/microbiolspec.plas-0008-2013 (2014).
Soler, N. et al. Characterization of a relaxase belonging to the MOBT family, a widespread family in Firmicutes mediating the transfer of ICEs. Mob. DNA 10, 18 (2019).
Google Scholar
Heilers, J.-H. et al. DNA processing by the MOBH family relaxase TraI encoded within the gonococcal genetic island. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, 8136–8153 (2019).
Google Scholar
Murphy, J., Mahony, J., Ainsworth, S., Nauta, A. & Sinderen, D. Bacteriophage orphan DNA methyltransferases: insights from their bacterial origin, function, and occurrence. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 79, 7547–7555 (2013).
Google Scholar
Günthert, U. & Reiners, L. Bacillus subtilis phage SPR codes for a DNA methyltransferase with triple sequence specificity. Nucleic Acids Res. 15, 3689–3702 (1987).
Google Scholar
Takahashi, N., Naito, Y., Handa, N. & Kobayashi, I. A DNA methyltransferase can protect the genome from postdisturbance attack by a restriction-modification gene complex. J. Bacteriol. 184, 6100–6108 (2002).
Google Scholar
Fomenkov, A. et al. Plasmid replication-associated single-strand-specific methyltransferases. Nucleic Acids Res. 48, 12858–12873 (2020).
Google Scholar
Petrova, V., Chitteni-Pattu, S., Drees, J. C., Inman, R. B. & Cox, M. M. An SOS inhibitor that binds to free RecA protein: the PsiB protein. Mol. Cell 36, 121–130 (2009).
Google Scholar
Al Mamun, A. A. M., Kishida, K. & Christie, P. J. Protein transfer through an F plasmid-encoded type IV secretion system suppresses the mating-induced SOS response. mBio 12, e01629-21 (2021).
Roy, D., Huguet, K. T., Grenier, F. & Burrus, V. IncC conjugative plasmids and SXT/R391 elements repair double-strand breaks caused by CRISPR–Cas during conjugation. Nucleic Acids Res. 48, 8815–8827 (2020).
Google Scholar
Shereda, R. D., Kozlov, A. G., Lohman, T. M., Cox, M. M. & Keck, J. L. SSB as an organizer/mobilizer of genome maintenance complexes. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 43, 289–318 (2008).
Google Scholar
Pinilla-Redondo, R. et al. Discovery of multiple anti-CRISPRs highlights anti-defense gene clustering in mobile genetic elements. Nat. Commun. 11, 5652 (2020).
Google Scholar
Gerdes, K., Christensen, S. K. & Løbner-Olesen, A. Prokaryotic toxin–antitoxin stress response loci. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 3, 371–382 (2005).
Google Scholar
Sutton, M. D., Smith, B. T., Godoy, V. G. & Walker, G. C. The SOS response: recent insights into umuDC-dependent mutagenesis and DNA damage tolerance. Ann. Rev. Genet. 34, 479–497 (2000).
Lodwick, D., Owen, D. & Strike, P. DNA sequence analysis of the IMP UV protection and mutation operon of the plasmid TP110: identification of a third gene. Nucleic Acids Res. 18, 5045–5050 (1990).
Google Scholar
Kulaeva, O. I., Wootton, J. C., Levine, A. S. & Woodgate, R. Characterization of the umu-complementing operon from R391. J. Bacteriol. 177, 2737–2743 (1995).
Munoz-Najar, U. & Vijayakumar, M. N. An operon that confers UV resistance by evoking the SOS mutagenic response in streptococcal conjugative transposon Tn5252. J. Bacteriol. 181, 2782–2788 (1999).
Google Scholar
Permina, E. A., Mironov, A. A. & Gelfand, M. S. Damage-repair error-prone polymerases of eubacteria: association with mobile genome elements. Gene 293, 133–140 (2002).
Google Scholar
McLenigan, M. P., Kulaeva, O. I., Ennis, D. G., Levine, A. S. & Woodgate, R. The bacteriophage P1 HumD protein is a functional homolog of the prokaryotic UmuD′-like proteins and facilitates SOS mutagenesis in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 181, 7005–7013 (1999).
Google Scholar
Goldsmith, M., Sarov-Blat, L. & Livneh, Z. Plasmid-encoded MucB protein is a DNA polymerase (pol RI) specialized for lesion bypass in the presence of MucA′, RecA, and SSB. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 11227–11231 (2000).
Google Scholar
Turlan, C., Prudhomme, M., Fichant, G., Martin, B. & Gutierrez, C. SpxA1, a novel transcriptional regulator involved in X-state (competence) development in Streptococcus pneumoniae. Mol. Microbiol. 73, 492–506 (2009).
Google Scholar
Garriss, G. & Henriques-Normark, B. Lysogeny in Streptococcus pneumoniae. Microorganisms 8, 1546 (2020).
Google Scholar
Del Grosso, M. et al. Macrolide efflux genes mef(A) and mef(E) are carried by different genetic elements in Streptococcus pneumoniae. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40, 774–778 (2002).
Google Scholar
Croucher, N. J. et al. Horizontal DNA transfer mechanisms of bacteria as weapons of intragenomic conflict. PLoS Biol. 14, e1002394 (2016).
Google Scholar
Norman, A., Hansen, L. H. & Sørensen, S. J. Conjugative plasmids: vessels of the communal gene pool. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B. Biol. Sci. 364, 2275–2289 (2009).
Google Scholar
Rubin, B. E. et al. Species- and site-specific genome editing in complex bacterial communities. Nat. Microbiol. 7, 34–47 (2022).
Google Scholar
Araya, D. P. et al. Efficacy of plasmid-encoded CRISPR-Cas antimicrobial is affected by competitive factors found in wild Enterococcus faecalis isolates. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.03.08.483478 (2022).
Citorik, R. J., Mimee, M. & Lu, T. K. Sequence-specific antimicrobials using efficiently delivered RNA-guided nucleases. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 1141–1145 (2014).
Google Scholar
Rodrigues, M., McBride, S. W., Hullahalli, K.,Palmer, K. L. & Duerkop, B. A. Conjugative Delivery of CRISPR-Cas9 for the Selective Depletion of Antibiotic-Resistant Enterococci. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 63, 10.1128/aac.01454-19 (2019).
Benson, D. A. et al. GenBank. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, D36–D42 (2013).
Google Scholar
Mitchell, A. L. et al. MGnify: the microbiome analysis resource in 2020. Nucleic Acids Res. 48, D570–D578 (2020).
Google Scholar
Hyatt, D. et al. Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinf. 11, 119 (2010).
Google Scholar
Seemann, T. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 30, 2068–2069 (2014).
Google Scholar
Miller, D., Stern, A. & Burstein, D. Deciphering microbial gene function using natural language processing. Nat. Commun. 13, 5731 (2022).
Google Scholar
Steinegger, M. & Söding, J. MMseqs2 enables sensitive protein sequence searching for the analysis of massive data sets. Nat. Biotechnol. 35, 1026–1028 (2017).
Google Scholar
Katoh, K., Misawa, K., Kuma, K. & Miyata, T. MAFFT: a novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform. Nucleic Acids Res. 30, 3059–3066 (2002).
Google Scholar
Eddy, S. R. Accelerated profile HMM searches. PLoS Comput. Biol. 7, e1002195 (2011).
Google Scholar
Garcillán-Barcia, M. P., Redondo-Salvo, S., Vielva, L. & de la Cruz, F. in Horizontal Gene Transfer: Methods and Protocols. Methods in Molecular Biology vol. 2075 (ed. de la Cruz, F.) 295–308 (Humana, New York, 2020).
Mistry, J. et al. Pfam: the protein families database in 2021. Nucleic Acids Res. 49, D412–D419 (2020).
Google Scholar
Li, X. et al. oriTfinder: a web-based tool for the identification of origin of transfers in DNA sequences of bacterial mobile genetic elements. Nucleic Acids Res. 46, W229–W234 (2018).
Google Scholar
Zrimec, J. Multiple plasmid origin-of-transfer regions might aid the spread of antimicrobial resistance to human pathogens. MicrobiologyOpen 9, e1129 (2020).
Google Scholar
Camacho, C. et al. BLAST+: architecture and applications. BMC Bioinf. 10, 421 (2009).
Google Scholar
Li, W. & Godzik, A. CD-HIT: a fast program for clustering and comparing large sets of protein or nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics 22, 1658–1659 (2006).
Google Scholar
Letunic, I. & Bork, P. Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL) v5: an online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 49, W293–W296 (2021).
Ciccarelli, F. D. et al. Toward automatic reconstruction of a highly resolved tree of life. Science 311, 1283–1287 (2006).
Google Scholar
ggtreeExtra: an R package to add geom layers on circular or other layout tree of ‘ggtree’ (Bioconductor, 2022).
Kanehisa, M. & Goto, S. KEGG: Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 28, 27–30 (2000).
Google Scholar
Riadi, G., Medina-Moenne, C. & Holmes, D. S. TnpPred: a web service for the robust prediction of prokaryotic transposases. Int. J. Genomics 2012, 678761 (2012).
Buchfink, B., Xie, C. & Huson, D. H. Fast and sensitive protein alignment using DIAMOND. Nat. Methods 12, 59–60 (2015).
Google Scholar
The UniProt Consortium. UniProt: the Universal Protein Knowledgebase in 2023. Nucleic Acids Res. 51, D523–D531 (2023).
Google Scholar
Wang, J. et al. The conserved domain database in 2023. Nucleic Acids Res. 51, D384–D388 (2023).
Google Scholar
Sayers, E. W. et al. Database resources of the National Center for Biotechnology Information in 2023. Nucleic Acids Res. 51, D29–D38 (2023).
Soding, J., Biegert, A. & Lupas, A. HHpred interactive server for protein homology detection and structure prediction. Nucleic Acids Res. 33, W244–W248 (2005).
Berman, H. M. et al. The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res. 28, 235–242 (2000).
Google Scholar
Lin Z. et al. Evolutionary-scale prediction of atomic-level protein structure with a language model. Science 379, 1123–1130 (2023).
van Kempen, M. et al. Fast and accurate protein structure search with Foldseek. Nat. Biotechnol. 42, 243–246 (2024).
Google Scholar
Meng, E. C. et al. UCSF ChimeraX: tools for structure building and analysis. Protein Sci. 32, e4792 (2023).
Google Scholar
Nomura, N. et al. Identification of eleven single-strand initiation sequences (SSI) for priming of DNA replication in the F, R6K, R100 and ColE2 plasmids. Gene 108, 15–22 (1991).
Google Scholar
Ross, W. et al. A third recognition element in bacterial promoters: DNA binding by the α subunit of RNA polymerase. Science 262, 1407–1413 (1993).
Google Scholar
Gruber, A. R., Lorenz, R., Bernhart, S. H., Neuböck, R. & Hofacker, I. L. The Vienna RNA Websuite. Nucleic Acids Res. 36, W70–W74 (2008).
Google Scholar
Lorenz, R. et al. ViennaRNA package 2.0. Algorithms Mol. Biol. 6, 26 (2011).
Google Scholar
Jossinet, F. RNArtistCore: a Kotlin DSL and library to create and plot RNA 2D structures. GitHub https://github.com/fjossinet/RNArtistCore (2023).
Yu, D. et al. An efficient recombination system for chromosome engineering in Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 5978–5983 (2000).
Google Scholar
Tu, Q. et al. Room temperature electrocompetent bacterial cells improve DNA transformation and recombineering efficiency. Sci. Rep. 6, 24648 (2016).
Google Scholar
Malaka De Silva, P. et al. A tale of two plasmids: contributions of plasmid associated phenotypes to epidemiological success among Shigella. Proc. R. Soc. B. Biol. Sci. 289, 20220581 (2022).
Google Scholar
Darphorn, T. S. Antibiotic resistance plasmid composition and architecture in Escherichia coli isolates from meat. Sci. Rep. 13, 2136 (2021).
Thisted, T. & Gerdes, K. Mechanism of post-segregational killing by the hok/sok system of plasmid R1. J. Mol. Biol. 223, 41–54 (1992).
Google Scholar
Gerdes, K. The parB (hok/sok) locus of plasmid R1: a general purpose plasmid stabilization system. Nat. Biotechnol. 6, 1402–1405 (1988).
Google Scholar
Le Rhun, A. et al. Profiling the intragenic toxicity determinants of toxin–antitoxin systems: revisiting hok/Sok regulation. Nucleic Acids Res. 51, e4 (2023).
Google Scholar
Loh, S. M., Cram, D. S. & Skurray, R. A. Nucleotide sequence and transcriptional analysis of a third function (Flm) involved in F-plasmid maintenance. Gene 66, 259–268 (1988).
Google Scholar
Birge, E. A. Bacterial and bacteriophage genetics. VDOC.pub Library https://vdoc.pub/documents/bacterial-and-bacteriophage-genetics-5rte3vvpnkt0 (2006).
Her, H.-L., Lin, P.-T. & Wu, Y.-W. PangenomeNet: a pan-genome-based network reveals functional modules on antimicrobial resistome for Escherichia coli strains. BMC Bioinf. 22, 548 (2021).
Google Scholar
Uribe, R. V. et al. Discovery and characterization of Cas9 inhibitors disseminated across seven bacterial Phyla. Cell Host Microbe 25, 233–241.e5 (2019).
Google Scholar
Davidson, A. R. et al. Anti-CRISPRs: protein inhibitors of CRISPR-Cas systems. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 89, 309–332 (2020).
Google Scholar
