MorPhiC Consortium: towards functional characterization of all human genes – Nature
Watson, J. D. & Crick, F. H. Molecular structure of nucleic acids; a structure for deoxyribose nucleic acid. Nature 171, 737–738 (1953).
Google Scholar
Venter, J. C. et al. The sequence of the human genome. Science 291, 1304–1351 (2001).
Google Scholar
Lander, E. S. et al. Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature 409, 860–921 (2001).
Google Scholar
Edwards, A. M. et al. Too many roads not taken. Nature 470, 163–165 (2011).
Google Scholar
Zhou, W. et al. Global Biobank Meta-analysis Initiative: powering genetic discovery across human disease. Cell Genomics 2, 100192 (2022).
Google Scholar
Taliun, D. et al. Sequencing of 53,831 diverse genomes from the NHLBI TOPMed Program. Nature 590, 290–299 (2021).
Google Scholar
Sollis, E. et al. The NHGRI-EBI GWAS Catalog: knowledgebase and deposition resource. Nucleic Acids Res. 51, D977–D985 (2023).
Google Scholar
Rehm, H. L. et al. ClinGen–the clinical genome resource. New Engl. J. Med. 372, 2235–2242 (2015).
Google Scholar
Landrum, M. J. et al. ClinVar: public archive of relationships among sequence variation and human phenotype. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, D980–D985 (2014).
Google Scholar
Karczewski, K. J. et al. Systematic single-variant and gene-based association testing of thousands of phenotypes in 394,841 UK Biobank exomes. Cell Genomics 2, 100168 (2022).
Google Scholar
Backman, J. D. et al. Exome sequencing and analysis of 454,787 UK Biobank participants. Nature 599, 628–634 (2021).
Google Scholar
Mountjoy, E. et al. An open approach to systematically prioritize causal variants and genes at all published human GWAS trait-associated loci. Nat. Genet. 53, 1527–1533 (2021).
Google Scholar
Yang, J. et al. Conditional and joint multiple-SNP analysis of GWAS summary statistics identifies additional variants influencing complex traits. Nat. Genet. 44, 369–375 (2012).
Google Scholar
Baxter, S. M. et al. Centers for Mendelian genomics: a decade of facilitating gene discovery. Genet. Med. 24, 784–797 (2022).
Google Scholar
Bamshad, M. J., Nickerson, D. A. & Chong, J. X. Mendelian gene discovery: fast and furious with no end in sight. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 105, 448–455 (2019).
Google Scholar
Karczewski, K. J. et al. The mutational constraint spectrum quantified from variation in 141,456 humans. Nature 581, 434–443 (2020). The gnomAD paper describes loss-of-function variants in the human genome on the basis of the aggregation of 125,748 exomes and 15,708 genomes from human sequencing studies.
Google Scholar
Lek, M. et al. Analysis of protein-coding genetic variation in 60,706 humans. Nature 536, 285–291 (2016).
Google Scholar
Cassa, C. A. et al. Estimating the selective effects of heterozygous protein-truncating variants from human exome data. Nat. Genet. 49, 806–810 (2017).
Google Scholar
Saleheen, D. et al. Human knockouts and phenotypic analysis in a cohort with a high rate of consanguinity. Nature 544, 235–239 (2017).
Google Scholar
Narasimhan, V. M. et al. Health and population effects of rare gene knockouts in adult humans with related parents. Science 352, 474–477 (2016).
Google Scholar
Dickinson, M. E. et al. High-throughput discovery of novel developmental phenotypes. Nature 537, 508–514 (2016).
Google Scholar
White, J. K. et al. Genome-wide generation and systematic phenotyping of knockout mice reveals new roles for many genes. Cell 154, 452–464 (2013).
Google Scholar
Groza, T. et al. The International Mouse Phenotyping Consortium: comprehensive knockout phenotyping underpinning the study of human disease. Nucleic Acids Res. 51, D1038–D1045 (2023).
Google Scholar
Meehan, T. F. et al. Disease model discovery from 3,328 gene knockouts by The International Mouse Phenotyping Consortium. Nat. Genet. 49, 1231–1238 (2017).
Google Scholar
The ENCODE Project Consortium. The ENCODE (ENCyclopedia Of DNA Elements) Project. Science 306, 636–640 (2004).
Google Scholar
Bernstein, B. E. et al. The NIH Roadmap Epigenomics Mapping Consortium. Nat. Biotechnol. 28, 1045–1048 (2010).
Google Scholar
Roadmap Epigenomics, C. et al. Integrative analysis of 111 reference human epigenomes. Nature 518, 317–330 (2015).
Google Scholar
Dekker, J. et al. The 4D nucleome project. Nature 549, 219–226 (2017).
Google Scholar
Regev, A. et al. The Human Cell Atlas. eLife 6, e27041 (2017).
Google Scholar
Jain, S. et al. Advances and prospects for the Human BioMolecular Atlas Program (HuBMAP). Nat. Cell Biol. 25, 1089–1100 (2023).
Google Scholar
Behan, F. M. et al. Prioritization of cancer therapeutic targets using CRISPR–Cas9 screens. Nature 568, 511–516 (2019). This large-scale screening effort mapped cancer dependencies using genome-scale screens across hundreds of cell lines, enabling the identification of new putative therapeutic targets and genetic similarities across cancer subtypes.
Google Scholar
Tsherniak, A. et al. Defining a cancer dependency map. Cell 170, 564–576.e516 (2017).
Google Scholar
Replogle, J. M. et al. Mapping information-rich genotype-phenotype landscapes with genome-scale Perturb-seq. Cell 185, 2559–2575.e2528 (2022).
Google Scholar
Ramezani, M. et al. A genome-wide atlas of human cell morphology. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.08.06.552164 (2023).
Luck, K. et al. A reference map of the human binary protein interactome. Nature 580, 402–408 (2020).
Google Scholar
Funk, L. et al. The phenotypic landscape of essential human genes. Cell 185, 4634–4653.e4622 (2022).
Google Scholar
Shalem, O. et al. Genome-scale CRISPR–Cas9 knockout screening in human cells. Science 343, 84–87 (2014).
Google Scholar
Przybyla, L. & Gilbert, L. A. A new era in functional genomics screens. Nat. Rev. Genet. 23, 89–103 (2022).
Google Scholar
Nunez, J. K. et al. Genome-wide programmable transcriptional memory by CRISPR-based epigenome editing. Cell 184, 2503–2519.e2517 (2021). The development and demonstration of the CRISPRoff strategy as a programmable epigenetic memory writer that is heritable, reversible, and compatible with genome-wide screening.
Google Scholar
Gilbert, L. A. et al. CRISPR-mediated modular RNA-guided regulation of transcription in eukaryotes. Cell 154, 442–451 (2013).
Google Scholar
Thomson, J. A. et al. Embryonic stem cell lines derived from human blastocysts. Science 282, 1145–1147 (1998).
Google Scholar
Takahashi, K. et al. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from adult human fibroblasts by defined factors. Cell 131, 861–872 (2007). This study describes the induction of pluripotent stem cells from adult human fibroblasts by defined factors.
Google Scholar
Li, Q. V., Rosen, B. P. & Huangfu, D. Decoding pluripotency: genetic screens to interrogate the acquisition, maintenance, and exit of pluripotency. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Syst. Biol. Med. 12, e1464 (2020).
Google Scholar
Rowe, R. G. & Daley, G. Q. Induced pluripotent stem cells in disease modelling and drug discovery. Nat. Rev. Genet. 20, 377–388 (2019).
Google Scholar
International Stem Cell, I. et al. Screening ethnically diverse human embryonic stem cells identifies a chromosome 20 minimal amplicon conferring growth advantage. Nat. Biotechnol. 29, 1132–1144 (2011).
Google Scholar
Bock, C. et al. High-content CRISPR screening. Nat. Rev. Methods Primers 2, 9 (2022).
Google Scholar
Su, K. et al. NetAct: a computational platform to construct core transcription factor regulatory networks using gene activity. Genome Biol. 23, 270 (2022).
Google Scholar
Fulco, C. P. et al. Activity-by-contact model of enhancer-promoter regulation from thousands of CRISPR perturbations. Nat. Genet. 51, 1664–1669 (2019).
Google Scholar
Bravo Gonzalez-Blas, C. et al. SCENIC+: single-cell multiomic inference of enhancers and gene regulatory networks. Nat. Methods 20, 1355–1367 (2023).
Google Scholar
Pantazis, C. B. et al. A reference human induced pluripotent stem cell line for large-scale collaborative studies. Cell Stem Cell 29, 1685–1702.e1622 (2022).
Google Scholar
Jinek, M. et al. A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science 337, 816–821 (2012).
Google Scholar
Jinek, M. et al. RNA-programmed genome editing in human cells. eLife 2, e00471 (2013).
Google Scholar
Cong, L. et al. Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas systems. Science 339, 819–823 (2013).
Google Scholar
Ran, F. A. et al. Genome engineering using the CRISPR–Cas9 system. Nat. Protoc. 8, 2281–2308 (2013).
Google Scholar
Skarnes, W. C., Pellegrino, E. & McDonough, J. A. Improving homology-directed repair efficiency in human stem cells. Methods 164-165, 18–28 (2019).
Google Scholar
Weisheit, I. et al. Detection of deleterious on-target effects after HDR-mediated CRISPR editing. Cell Rep. 31, 107689 (2020).
Google Scholar
Skarnes, W. C. et al. A conditional knockout resource for the genome-wide study of mouse gene function. Nature 474, 337–342 (2011).
Google Scholar
Birling, M. C. et al. A resource of targeted mutant mouse lines for 5,061 genes. Nat. Genet. 53, 416–419 (2021).
Google Scholar
Valenzuela, D. M. et al. High-throughput engineering of the mouse genome coupled with high-resolution expression analysis. Nat. Biotechnol. 21, 652–659 (2003).
Google Scholar
Gilbert, L. A. et al. Genome-scale CRISPR-mediated control of gene repression and activation. Cell 159, 647–661 (2014).
Google Scholar
O’Geen, H. et al. Ezh2–dCas9 and KRAB–dCas9 enable engineering of epigenetic memory in a context-dependent manner. Epigenet. Chromatin 12, 26 (2019).
Google Scholar
Amabile, A. et al. Inheritable silencing of endogenous genes by hit-and-run targeted epigenetic editing. Cell 167, 219–232.e214 (2016).
Google Scholar
Nishimura, K., Fukagawa, T., Takisawa, H., Kakimoto, T. & Kanemaki, M. An auxin-based degron system for the rapid depletion of proteins in nonplant cells. Nat. Methods 6, 917–922 (2009). This study developed and used the auxin-based degron system for rapid protein depletion in non-plant cells.
Google Scholar
Nishimura, K. et al. A super-sensitive auxin-inducible degron system with an engineered auxin-TIR1 pair. Nucleic Acids Res. 48, e108 (2020).
Google Scholar
Li, S., Prasanna, X., Salo, V. T., Vattulainen, I. & Ikonen, E. An efficient auxin-inducible degron system with low basal degradation in human cells. Nat. Methods 16, 866–869 (2019).
Google Scholar
Nabet, B. et al. The dTAG system for immediate and target-specific protein degradation. Nat. Chem. Biol. 14, 431–441 (2018).
Google Scholar
Buckley, D. L. et al. HaloPROTACS: use of small molecule PROTACs to induce degradation of HaloTag fusion proteins. ACS Chem. Biol. 10, 1831–1837 (2015).
Google Scholar
McKusick, V. A. Mendelian Inheritance in Man and its online version, OMIM. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 80, 588–604 (2007).
Google Scholar
Sharma, A., Sances, S., Workman, M. J. & Svendsen, C. N. Multi-lineage human iPSC-derived platforms for disease modeling and drug discovery. Cell Stem Cell 26, 309–329 (2020).
Google Scholar
Yang, D. et al. CRISPR screening uncovers a central requirement for HHEX in pancreatic lineage commitment and plasticity restriction. Nat. Cell Biol. 24, 1064–1076 (2022).
Google Scholar
Guttikonda, S. R. et al. Fully defined human pluripotent stem cell-derived microglia and tri-culture system model C3 production in Alzheimer’s disease. Nat. Neurosci. 24, 343–354 (2021).
Google Scholar
Kriks, S. et al. Dopamine neurons derived from human ES cells efficiently engraft in animal models of Parkinson’s disease. Nature 480, 547–551 (2011).
Google Scholar
Pankratz, M. T. et al. Directed neural differentiation of human embryonic stem cells via an obligated primitive anterior stage. Stem Cells 25, 1511–1520 (2007).
Google Scholar
Soncin, F. et al. Derivation of functional trophoblast stem cells from primed human pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cell Rep. 17, 1303–1317 (2022).
Google Scholar
Hogrebe, N. J., Maxwell, K. G., Augsornworawat, P. & Millman, J. R. Generation of insulin-producing pancreatic beta cells from multiple human stem cell lines. Nat. Protoc. 16, 4109–4143 (2021).
Google Scholar
D’Amour, K. A. et al. Efficient differentiation of human embryonic stem cells to definitive endoderm. Nat. Biotechnol. 23, 1534–1541 (2005).
Google Scholar
Burridge, P. W., Holmstrom, A. & Wu, J. C. Chemically defined culture and cardiomyocyte differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells. Curr. Protoc. Hum. Genet. 87, 21.23.1–21.23.15 (2015).
Isaja, L., Ferriol-Laffouillere, S. L., Mucci, S., Rodriguez-Varela, M. S. & Romorini, L. Embryoid bodies-based multilineage differentiation of human embryonic stem cells grown on feeder-free conditions. Methods Mol. Biol. 2520, 189–198 (2022).
Google Scholar
Adamson, B. et al. A multiplexed single-cell CRISPR screening platform enables systematic dissection of the unfolded protein response. Cell 167, 1867–1882.e1821 (2016).
Google Scholar
Dixit, A. et al. Perturb-Seq: dissecting molecular circuits with scalable single-cell RNA profiling of pooled genetic screens. Cell 167, 1853–1866.e1817 (2016). This article describes the development of Perturb-seq technology, which enables CRISPR screens to be performed in combination with transcriptomic profiling, thereby providing unbiased high-content readouts in response to specific genetic perturbations.
Google Scholar
Schnitzler, G. R. et al. Convergence of coronary artery disease genes onto endothelial cell programs. Nature 626, 799–807 (2024).
Google Scholar
Kunes, R. Z., Walle, T., Land, M., Nawy, T. & Pe’er, T. Supervised discovery of interpretable gene programs from single-cell data. Nat. Biotechnol. 42, 1084–1095 (2024).
Google Scholar
Kotliar, D. et al. Identifying gene expression programs of cell-type identity and cellular activity with single-cell RNA-seq. eLife 8, e43803 (2019).
Google Scholar
Gschwind, A. R. et al. An encyclopedia of enhancer-gene regulatory interactions in the human genome. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.11.09.563812 (2023).
Avsec, Z. et al. Base-resolution models of transcription-factor binding reveal soft motif syntax. Nat. Genet. 53, 354–366 (2021).
Google Scholar
Qiu, X. et al. Mapping transcriptomic vector fields of single cells. Cell 185, 690–711.e645 (2022).
Google Scholar
Qiu, X. et al. Reversed graph embedding resolves complex single-cell trajectories. Nat. Methods 14, 979–982 (2017).
Google Scholar
La Manno, G. et al. RNA velocity of single cells. Nature 560, 494–498 (2018).
Google Scholar
Theodoris, C. V. et al. Transfer learning enables predictions in network biology. Nature 618, 616–624 (2023).
Google Scholar
Schutgens, F. & Clevers, H. Human organoids: tools for understanding biology and treating diseases. Annu. Rev. Pathol. 15, 211–234 (2020).
Google Scholar
