Pan-genome bridges wheat structural variations with habitat and breeding – Nature
International Wheat Genome Sequencing Consortium (IWGSC). Shifting the limits in wheat research and breeding using a fully annotated reference genome. Science 361, eaar7191 (2018).
Google Scholar
Walkowiak, S. et al. Multiple wheat genomes reveal global variation in modern breeding. Nature 588, 277–283 (2020).
Google Scholar
Salamini, F., Zkan, H., Brandolini, A., Schfer-Pregl, R. & Martin, W. Genetics and geography of wild cereal domestication in the near east. Nat. Rev. Genet. 3, 429–441 (2002).
Google Scholar
The International Wheat Genome Sequencing Consortium (IWGSC). A chromosome-based draft sequence of the hexaploid bread wheat (Triticum aestivum) genome. Science 345, 1251788 (2014).
Google Scholar
Feldman, M. & Levy, A. A. Genome evolution due to allopolyploidization in wheat. Genetics 192, 763–774 (2012).
Google Scholar
Biehl, P. F. et al. Ancient DNA from 8400 year-old catalhöyük wheat: implications for the origin of neolithic agriculture. PLoS ONE 11, e0151974 (2016).
Google Scholar
Zhao, X. B. et al. Population genomics unravels the Holocene history of bread wheat and its relatives. Nat. Plants 9, 403–419 (2023).
Google Scholar
Michael F, S. et al. A 3,000-year-old Egyptian emmer wheat genome reveals dispersal and domestication history. Nat. Plants 5, 1120–1128 (2019).
Google Scholar
Mcclatchie, M. et al. Neolithic farming in north-western Europe: archaeobotanical evidence from Ireland. J. Archaeol. Sci. 51, 206–215 (2014).
Google Scholar
Liu, X. et al. From ecological opportunism to multi-cropping: mapping food globalisation in prehistory. Quat. Sci. Rev. 206, 21–28 (2019).
Google Scholar
Hao, C. et al. Resequencing of 145 landmark cultivars reveals asymmetric sub-genome selection and strong founder genotype effects on wheat breeding in China. Mol. Plant 13, 1733–1751 (2020).
Google Scholar
Zhuang, Q. S. Chinese Wheat Improvement and Pedigree Analysis [Chinese] (Agricultural Press, 2003).
Murukarthick, J., Mona, S., Nils, S. & Martin, M. Building pan-genome infrastructures for crop plants and their use in association genetics. DNA Res. 28, dsaa030 (2021).
Google Scholar
Lei, L., Goltsman, E., Goodstein, D., Wu, G. A. & Vogel, J. P. Plant pan-genomics comes of age. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 72, 411–435 (2021).
Google Scholar
Mona, S., Murukarthick, J., Nils, S. & Martin, M. Plant pangenomes for crop improvement, biodiversity and evolution. Nat. Rev. Genet. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41576-024-00691-4 (2024).
Zhang, X. Y. & Appels, R. in The Wheat Genome (eds Appels, R. et al.) 93–111 (Springer, 2023).
Castillo, F. A. The Oxford Handbook of the Archaeology of Diet (Oxford Univ. Press, 2015).
Simon G, K. et al. A putative ABC transporter confers durable resistance to multiple fungal pathogens in wheat. Science 323, 1360–1363 (2009).
Google Scholar
Fu, D. et al. A kinase-START gene confers temperature-dependent resistance to wheat stripe rust. Science 323, 1357–1360 (2009).
Google Scholar
Wang, B. et al. De novo genome assembly and analyses of 12 founder inbred lines provide insights into maize heterosis. Nat. Genet. 55, 312–323 (2023).
Google Scholar
Qin, P. et al. Pan-genome analysis of 33 genetically diverse rice accessions reveals hidden genomic variations. Cell 184, 3542–3558.e16 (2021).
Google Scholar
Song, L. et al. Reducing brassinosteroid signalling enhances grain yield in semi-dwarf wheat. Nature 617, 118–124 (2023).
Google Scholar
Németh, A. & Längst, G. Genome organization in and around the nucleolus. Trends Genet. 27, 149–156 (2011).
Google Scholar
Kishii, M. & Mao, L. Synthetic hexaploid wheat: yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Engineering 4, 552–558 (2018).
Google Scholar
Guo, W. et al. Origin and adaptation to high altitude of Tibetan semi-wild wheat. Nat. Commun. 11, 5085 (2020).
Google Scholar
Zhou, Y. et al. Triticum population sequencing provides insights into wheat adaptation. Nat. Genet. 52, 1412–1422 (2020).
Google Scholar
Monat, C., Padmarasu, S., Lux, T., Wicker, T. & Mascher, M. TRITEX: chromosome-scale sequence assembly of Triticeae genomes with open-source tools. Genome Biol. 20, 284 (2019).
Google Scholar
Athiyannan, N. et al. Long-read genome sequencing of bread wheat facilitates disease resistance gene cloning. Nat. Genet. 54, 227–231 (2022).
Google Scholar
Kale, S. M. et al. A catalogue of resistance gene homologs and a chromosome-scale reference sequence support resistance gene mapping in winter wheat. Plant Biotechnol. J. 20, 1730–1742 (2022).
Google Scholar
Li, B. et al. Wheat centromeric retrotransposons: the new ones take a major role in centromeric structure. Plant J. 73, 952–965 (2013).
Google Scholar
Ahmed, H. I. et al. Einkorn genomics sheds light on history of the oldest domesticated wheat. Nature 620, 830–838 (2023).
Google Scholar
Wang, Z. et al. Dispersed emergence and protracted domestication of polyploid wheat uncovered by mosaic ancestral haploblock inference. Nat. Commun. 13, 3891 (2022).
Google Scholar
Cheng, H., Liu, J., Wen, J., Nie, X. & Jiang, Y. Frequent intra- and inter-species introgression shapes the landscape of genetic variation in bread wheat. Genome Biol. 20, 136 (2019).
Google Scholar
Oliver, S. N., Finnegan, E. J., Dennis, E. S., Peacock, W. J. & Trevaskis, B. Vernalization-induced flowering in cereals is associated with changes in histone methylation at the VERNALIZATION1 gene. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 8386–8391 (2009).
Google Scholar
Alonge, M. et al. Major impacts of widespread structural variation on gene expression and crop improvement in tomato. Cell 182, 145–161.e23 (2020).
Google Scholar
Li, G. et al. A high-quality genome assembly highlights rye genomic characteristics and agronomically important genes. Nat. Genet. 53, 574–584 (2021).
Google Scholar
Rabanus-Wallace, M. T. et al. Chromosome-scale genome assembly provides insights into rye biology, evolution and agronomic potential. Nat. Genet. 53, 564–573 (2021).
Google Scholar
Gabay, G., Zhang, J., Burguener, G. F., Howell, T. & Dubcovsky, J. Structural rearrangements in wheat (1BS)–rye (1RS) recombinant chromosomes affect gene dosage and root length. Plant Genome 14, e20079 (2021).
Google Scholar
Zhou, Y. et al. Introgressing the Aegilops tauschii genome into wheat as a basis for cereal improvement. Nat. Plants 7, 774–786 (2021).
Google Scholar
Song, J. M. et al. Eight high-quality genomes reveal pan-genome architecture and ecotype differentiation of Brassica napus. Nat. Plants 6, 34–45 (2020).
Google Scholar
Saayman, X., Graham, E., Nathan, W. J., Nussenzweig, A. & Esashi, F. Centromeres as universal hotspots of DNA breakage, driving RAD51-mediated recombination during quiescence. Mol. Cell 83, 523–538.e7 (2023).
Google Scholar
Nambiar, M. & Smith, G. R. Pericentromere-Specific cohesin complex prevents meiotic pericentric DNA double-strand breaks and lethal crossovers. Mol. Cell 71, 540–553.e4 (2018).
Google Scholar
He, F. et al. Exome sequencing highlights the role of wild-relative introgression in shaping the adaptive landscape of the wheat genome. Nat. Genet. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-019-0382-2 (2019).
Zhao, J. et al. Centromere repositioning and shifts in wheat evolution. Plant Commun. 4, 100556 (2023).
Google Scholar
Scott A, B. et al. Ppd-1 is a key regulator of inflorescence architecture and paired spikelet development in wheat. Nat. Plants 1, 14016 (2015).
Google Scholar
Yan, L. L. et al. The wheat VRN2 gene is a flowering repressor down-regulated by vernalization. Science 303, 1640–1644 (2004).
Google Scholar
Yan, L. et al. Positional cloning of the wheat vernalization gene VRN1. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 6263–6268 (2003).
Google Scholar
Hazen, S. P. et al. Copy number variation affecting the Photoperiod-B1 and Vernalization-A1 genes is associated with altered flowering time in wheat (Triticum aestivum). PLoS ONE https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0033234 (2012).
Würschum, T., Boeven, P. H. G., Langer, S. M., Longin, C. F. H. & Leiser, W. L. Multiply to conquer: copy number variations at Ppd-B1 and Vrn-A1 facilitate global adaptation in wheat. BMC Genet. 16, 96 (2015).
Google Scholar
Giroux, M. J. & Morris, C. F. Wheat grain hardness results from highly conserved mutations in the friabilin components puroindoline a and b. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 11, 6262–6266 (1998).
Google Scholar
Xie, T. et al. De novo plant genome assembly based on chromatin interactions: a case study of Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol. Plant 8, 489–492 (2015).
Google Scholar
Cheng, H., Concepcion, G. T., Feng, X., Zhang, H. & Li, H. Haplotype-resolved de novo assembly using phased assembly graphs with hifiasm. Nat. Methods 18, 170–175 (2021).
Google Scholar
Wingett, S. et al. HiCUP: pipeline for mapping and processing Hi-C data. F1000Res. 4, 1310 (2015).
Google Scholar
Zhang, J. et al. Allele-defined genome of the autopolyploid sugarcane Saccharum spontaneum L. Nat. Genet. 50, 1565–1573 (2018).
Google Scholar
Burton, J. N. et al. Chromosome-scale scaffolding of de novo genome assemblies based on chromatin interactions. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 1119–1125 (2013).
Google Scholar
Simao, F. A., Waterhouse, R. M., Ioannidis, P., Kriventseva, E. V. & Zdobnov, E. M. BUSCO: assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs. Bioinformatics 31, 3210–3212 (2015).
Google Scholar
Ou, S., Chen, J. & Jiang, N. Assessing genome assembly quality using the LTR assembly index (LAI). Nucleic Acids Res. 46, e126 (2018).
Google Scholar
Burkhard, S. et al. The NLR-Annotator tool enables annotation of the intracellular immune receptor repertoire. Plant Physiol. 183, 468–482 (2020).
Google Scholar
Tarailo-Graovac, M. & Chen, N. Using RepeatMasker to identify repetitive elements in genomic sequences. Curr. Protoc. Bioinformatics https://doi.org/10.1002/0471250953.bi0410s05 (2009).
Benson, G. Tandem repeats finder: a program to analyze DNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 27, 573–580 (1999).
Google Scholar
Yu, X. J., Zheng, H. K., Wang, J., Wang, W. & Su, B. Detecting lineage-specific adaptive evolution of brain-expressed genes in human using rhesus macaque as outgroup. Genomics 88, 745–751 (2006).
Google Scholar
Birney, E., Clamp, M. & Durbin, R. GeneWise and Genomewise. Genome Res. 14, 988–995 (2004).
Google Scholar
Haas, B. J. et al. Improving the Arabidopsis genome annotation using maximal transcript alignment assemblies. Nucleic Acids Res. 31, 5654–5666 (2003).
Google Scholar
Stanke, M. et al. AUGUSTUS: ab initio prediction of alternative transcripts. Nucleic Acids Res. 34, W435–W439 (2006).
Google Scholar
Burge, C. & Karlin, S. Prediction of complete gene structures in human genomic DNA. J. Mol. Biol. 268, 78–94 (1997).
Google Scholar
Guigo, R. Assembling genes from predicted exons in linear time with dynamic programming. J. Comput. Biol. 5, 681–702 (1998).
Google Scholar
Majoros, W. H., Pertea, M. & Salzberg, S. L. TigrScan and GlimmerHMM: two open source ab initio eukaryotic gene-finders. Bioinformatics 20, 2878–2879 (2004).
Google Scholar
Korf, I. Gene finding in novel genomes. BMC Bioinformatics 5, 59 (2004).
Google Scholar
Kim, D. et al. TopHat2: accurate alignment of transcriptomes in the presence of insertions, deletions and gene fusions. Genome Biol. 14, R36 (2013).
Google Scholar
Ghosh, S. & Chan, C. K. Analysis of RNA-seq data using TopHat and Cufflinks. Methods Mol. Biol. 1374, 339–361 (2016).
Google Scholar
Haas, B. J. et al. Automated eukaryotic gene structure annotation using EVidenceModeler and the Program to Assemble Spliced Alignments. Genome Biol. 9, R7 (2008).
Google Scholar
Altschul, S. F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E. W. & Lipman, D. J. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 215, 403–410 (1990).
Google Scholar
Pruitt, K. D., Tatusova, T. & Maglott, D. R. NCBI Reference Sequences (RefSeq): a curated non-redundant sequence database of genomes, transcripts and proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, D61–D65 (2007).
Google Scholar
Hunter, S. et al. InterPro: the integrative protein signature database. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, D211–D215 (2009).
Google Scholar
Kanehisa, M. & Goto, S. KEGG: Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 28, 27–30 (2000).
Google Scholar
Boeckmann, B. et al. The SWISS-PROT protein knowledgebase and its supplement TrEMBL in 2003. Nucleic Acids Res. 31, 365–370 (2003).
Google Scholar
Quevillon, E. et al. InterProScan: protein domains identifier. Nucleic Acids Res. 33, W116–W120 (2005).
Google Scholar
Tang, H. et al. Synteny and collinearity in plant genomes. Science 320, 486–488 (2008).
Google Scholar
Wu, T. D. & Watanabe, C. K. GMAP: a genomic mapping and alignment program for mRNA and EST sequences. Bioinformatics 21, 1859–1875 (2005).
Google Scholar
Li, H. & Durbin, R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows–Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25, 1754–1760 (2009).
Google Scholar
Li, H. et al. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25, 2078–2079 (2009).
Google Scholar
Weber, J. A., Aldana, R., Gallagher, B. D. & Edwards, J. S. Sentieon DNA pipeline for variant detection-Software-only solution, over 20× faster than GATK 3.3 with identical results. PeerJ PrePrints 4, e1672v1672 (2016).
McKenna, A. et al. The Genome Analysis Toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 20, 1297–1303 (2010).
Google Scholar
Wang, K., Li, M. & Hakonarson, H. ANNOVAR: functional annotation of genetic variants from high-throughput sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, e164 (2010).
Google Scholar
Marcais, G. et al. MUMmer4: a fast and versatile genome alignment system. PLoS Comput. Biol. 14, e1005944 (2018).
Google Scholar
Goel, M., Sun, H., Jiao, W. B. & Schneeberger, K. SyRI: finding genomic rearrangements and local sequence differences from whole-genome assemblies. Genome Biol. 20, 277 (2019).
Google Scholar
Jeffares, D. C. et al. Transient structural variations have strong effects on quantitative traits and reproductive isolation in fission yeast. Nat. Commun. 8, 14061 (2017).
Google Scholar
Chiang, C. et al. SpeedSeq: ultra-fast personal genome analysis and interpretation. Nat. Methods 12, 966–968 (2015).
Google Scholar
Huang, W., Li, L., Myers, J. R. & Marth, G. T. ART: a next-generation sequencing read simulator. Bioinformatics 28, 593–594 (2012).
Google Scholar
Laurens, V. D. M. Accelerating t-SNE using tree-based algorithms. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 15, 3221–3245 (2014).
Google Scholar
Yang, Z. et al. ggComp enables dissection of germplasm resources and construction of a multiscale germplasm network in wheat. Plant Physiol. 188, 1950–1965 (2022).
Google Scholar
Gao, F., Ming, C., Hu, W. & Li, H. New software for the fast estimation of population recombination rates (FastEPRR) in the genomic era. G3 6, 1563–1571 (2016).
Google Scholar
Danecek, P. et al. The variant call format and VCFtools. Bioinformatics 27, 2156–2158 (2011).
Google Scholar
Kang, H. M. et al. Variance component model to account for sample structure in genome-wide association studies. Nat. Genet. 42, 348–354 (2010).
Google Scholar
Katoh, K., Asimenos, G. & Toh, H. Multiple alignment of DNA sequences with MAFFT. Methods Mol. Biol. 537, 39–64 (2009).
Google Scholar
Price, M. N., Dehal, P. S. & Arkin, A. P. FastTree: computing large minimum evolution trees with profiles instead of a distance matrix. Mol. Biol. Evol. 26, 1641–1650 (2009).
Google Scholar
Quinlan, A. R. & Hall, I. M. BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinformatics 26, 841–842 (2010).
Google Scholar
Scrucca, L., Fop, M., Murphy, T. B. & Raftery, A. E. mclust 5: Clustering, classification and density estimation using Gaussian finite mixture models. R J. 8, 289–317 (2016).
Google Scholar
Chen, Y. et al. A collinearity-incorporating homology inference strategy for connecting emerging assemblies in the Triticeae tribe as a pilot practice in the plant pangenomic era. Mol. Plant 13, 1694–1708 (2020).
Google Scholar
Ma, S. et al. WheatOmics: a platform combining multiple omics data to accelerate functional genomics studies in wheat. Mol. Plant 14, 1965–1968 (2021).
Google Scholar
He, W. et al. NGenomeSyn: an easy-to-use and flexible tool for publication-ready visualization of syntenic relationships across multiple genomes. Bioinformatics 39, btad121 (2023).
Google Scholar
Li, H. Minimap2: pairwise alignment for nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics 34, 3094–3100 (2018).
Google Scholar
Han, F., Lamb, J. C. & Birchler, J. A. High frequency of centromere inactivation resulting in stable dicentric chromosomes of maize. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 3238–3243 (2006).
Google Scholar
Fu, S., Chen, L., Wang, Y., Li, M. & Tang, Z. Oligonucleotide probes for ND-FISH analysis to identify rye and wheat chromosomes. Sci. Rep. 5, 10552 (2015).
Google Scholar
Tang, Z., Yang, Z. & Fu, S. Oligonucleotides replacing the roles of repetitive sequences pAs1, pSc119.2, pTa-535, pTa71, CCS1, and pAWRC.1 for FISH analysis. J. Appl. Genet. 55, 313–318 (2014).
Google Scholar
