Species turnover does not rescue biodiversity in fragmented landscapes – Nature
Haddad, N. M. et al. Habitat fragmentation and its lasting impact on Earth’s ecosystems. Sci. Adv. 1, e1500052 (2015).
Google Scholar
Fahrig, L. Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 34, 487–515 (2003).
Google Scholar
Tscharntke, T. et al. Landscape moderation of biodiversity patterns and processes—eight hypotheses. Biol. Rev. 87, 661–685 (2012).
Google Scholar
Fletcher, R. J. et al. Is habitat fragmentation good for biodiversity? Biol. Conserv. 226, 9–15 (2018).
Google Scholar
Simberloff, D. & Abele, L. G. Refuge design and island biogeographic theory: effects of fragmentation. Am. Nat. 120, 41–50 (1982).
Google Scholar
Fahrig, L. et al. Is habitat fragmentation bad for biodiversity? Biol. Conserv. 230, 179–186 (2019).
Google Scholar
Díaz, S. et al. Pervasive human-driven decline of life on Earth points to the need for transformative change. Science 366, eaax3100 (2019).
Google Scholar
Jaureguiberry, P. et al. The direct drivers of recent global anthropogenic biodiversity loss. Sci. Adv. 8, eabm9982 (2022).
Google Scholar
Newbold, T. et al. Has land use pushed terrestrial biodiversity beyond the planetary boundary? A global assessment. Science 353, 288–291 (2016).
Google Scholar
Betts, M. G. et al. Global forest loss disproportionately erodes biodiversity in intact landscapes. Nature 547, 441–444 (2017).
Google Scholar
Johnson, C. N. et al. Biodiversity losses and conservation responses in the Anthropocene. Science 356, 270–275 (2017).
Google Scholar
Watling, J. I. et al. Support for the habitat amount hypothesis from a global synthesis of species density studies. Ecol. Lett. 23, 674–681 (2020).
Google Scholar
Wilson, E. O. & Willis, E. O. in Ecology and Evolution of Communities (eds Cody M. L. & Diamond J. M.) 522–534 (Harvard Univ. Press, 1975).
Simberloff, D. & Abele, L. G. Island biogeography theory and conservation practice. Science 191, 285–286 (1976).
Google Scholar
Ewers, R. M. & Didham, R. K. Confounding factors in the detection of species responses to habitat fragmentation. Biol. Rev. 81, 117–142 (2006).
Google Scholar
Didham, R. K., Kapos, V. & Ewers, R. M. Rethinking the conceptual foundations of habitat fragmentation research. Oikos 121, 161–170 (2012).
Google Scholar
Lindenmayer, D. B. & Fischer, J. Tackling the habitat fragmentation panchreston. Trends Ecol. Evol. 22, 127–132 (2007).
Google Scholar
Fahrig, L. Ecological responses to habitat fragmentation per se. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 48, 1–23 (2017).
Google Scholar
Riva, F. & Fahrig, L. Landscape‐scale habitat fragmentation is positively related to biodiversity, despite patch‐scale ecosystem decay. Ecol. Lett. 26, 268–277 (2023).
Google Scholar
Martín-Queller, E., Albert, C. H., Dumas, P. J. & Saatkamp, A. Islands, mainland, and terrestrial fragments: how isolation shapes plant diversity. Ecol. Evol. 7, 6904–6917 (2017).
Google Scholar
de Castro Solar, R. R. et al. How pervasive is biotic homogenization in human-modified tropical forest landscapes? Ecol. Lett. 18, 1108–1118 (2015).
Google Scholar
Pardini, R., de Arruda Bueno, A., Gardner, T. A., Prado, P. I. & Metzger, J. P. Beyond the fragmentation threshold hypothesis: regime shifts in biodiversity across fragmented landscapes. PLoS One 5, e13666 (2010).
Google Scholar
Torrenta, R. & Villard, M.-A. A test of the habitat amount hypothesis as an explanation for the species richness of forest bird assemblages. J. Biogeogr. 44, 1791–1801 (2017).
Google Scholar
Vieira, M. V., Almeida-Gomes, M., Delciellos, A. C., Cerqueira, R. & Crouzeilles, R. Fair tests of the habitat amount hypothesis require appropriate metrics of patch isolation: an example with small mammals in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Biol. Conserv. 226, 264–270 (2018).
Google Scholar
Fletcher, R. J. Jr., Smith, T. A. H., Kortessis, N., Bruna, E. M. & Holt, R. D. Landscape experiments unlock relationships among habitat loss, fragmentation, and patch-size effects. Ecology 104, e4037 (2023).
Google Scholar
Horváth, Z., Ptacnik, R., Vad, C. F. & Chase, J. M. Habitat loss over six decades accelerates regional and local biodiversity loss via changing landscape connectance. Ecol. Lett. 22, 1019–1027 (2019).
Google Scholar
Diekötter, T., Billeter, R. & Crist, T. O. Effects of landscape connectivity on the spatial distribution of insect diversity in agricultural mosaic landscapes. Basic Appl. Ecol. 9, 298–307 (2008).
Google Scholar
Fahrig, L. et al. Resolving the SLOSS dilemma for biodiversity conservation: a research agenda. Biol. Rev. 97, 99–114 (2022).
Google Scholar
Morante-Filho, J. C., Arroyo-Rodríguez, V. & Faria, D. Patterns and predictors of β-diversity in the fragmented Brazilian Atlantic forest: a multiscale analysis of forest specialist and generalist birds. J. Anim. Ecol. 85, 240–250 (2016).
Google Scholar
Quinn, J. F. & Harrison, S. P. Effects of habitat fragmentation and isolation on species richness: evidence from biogeographic patterns. Oecologia 75, 132–140 (1988).
Google Scholar
May, F., Rosenbaum, B., Schurr, F. M. & Chase, J. M. The geometry of habitat fragmentation: effects of species distribution patterns on extinction risk due to habitat conversion. Ecol. Evol. 9, 2775–2790 (2019).
Google Scholar
Lôbo, D., Leão, T., Melo, F. P. L., Santos, A. M. M. & Tabarelli, M. Forest fragmentation drives Atlantic forest of northeastern Brazil to biotic homogenization. Divers. Distrib. 17, 287–296 (2011).
Google Scholar
Arce-Peña, N. P., Arroyo-Rodríguez, V., Avila-Cabadilla, L. D., Moreno, C. E. & Andresen, E. Homogenization of terrestrial mammals in fragmented rainforests: the loss of species turnover and its landscape drivers. Ecol. Appl. 32, e02476 (2022).
Google Scholar
Tscharntke, T., Batáry, P. & Grass, I. Mixing on- and off-field measures for biodiversity conservation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 39, 726–733 (2024).
Google Scholar
Fahrig, L. Why do several small patches hold more species than few large patches? Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 29, 615–628 (2020).
Google Scholar
Prugh, L. R., Hodges, K. E., Sinclair, A. R. E. & Brashares, J. S. Effect of habitat area and isolation on fragmented animal populations. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 20770–20775 (2008).
Google Scholar
Jost, L. Partitioning diversity into independent alpha and beta components. Ecology 88, 2427–2439 (2007).
Google Scholar
Jamoneau, A., Chabrerie, O., Closset-Kopp, D. & Decocq, G. Fragmentation alters beta-diversity patterns of habitat specialists within forest metacommunities. Ecography 35, 124–133 (2012).
Google Scholar
Dambros, C. S., Junqueira Izzo, T., Castuera de Oliveira, L., Eduardo Vicente, R. & Peres, C. A. Beta-diversity buffers fragmented landscapes against local species losses. Oikos 2024, e10401 (2024).
Google Scholar
Pfeifer, M. et al. Creation of forest edges has a global impact on forest vertebrates. Nature 551, 187–191 (2017).
Google Scholar
Phillips, H. R. P., Halley, J. M., Urbina-Cardona, J. N. & Purvis, A. The effect of fragment area on site‐level biodiversity. Ecography 41, 1220–1231 (2018).
Google Scholar
Nekola, J. C. & White, P. S. The distance decay of similarity in biogeography and ecology. J. Biogeogr. 26, 867–878 (1999).
Google Scholar
Graco-Roza, C. et al. Distance decay 2.0—a global synthesis of taxonomic and functional turnover in ecological communities. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 31, 1399–1421 (2022).
Google Scholar
Arroyo-Rodríguez, V. et al. Plant β-diversity in fragmented rain forests: testing floristic homogenization and differentiation hypotheses. J. Ecol. 101, 1449–1458 (2013).
Google Scholar
Sfair, J. C., Arroyo-Rodríguez, V., Santos, B. A. & Tabarelli, M. Taxonomic and functional divergence of tree assemblages in a fragmented tropical forest. Ecol. Appl. 26, 1816–1826 (2016).
Google Scholar
Simberloff, D. & Cox, J. Consequences and costs of conservation corridors. Conserv. Biol. 1, 63–71 (1987).
Google Scholar
Damschen, E. I. et al. Ongoing accumulation of plant diversity through habitat connectivity in an 18-year experiment. Science 365, 1478–1480 (2019).
Google Scholar
Villard, M.-A. & Metzger, J. P. Beyond the fragmentation debate: a conceptual model to predict when habitat configuration really matters. J. Appl. Ecol. 51, 309–318 (2014).
Google Scholar
Banks-Leite, C., Ewers, R. M., Folkard-Tapp, H. & Fraser, A. Countering the effects of habitat loss, fragmentation, and degradation through habitat restoration. One Earth 3, 672–676 (2020).
Google Scholar
Chase, J. M., Blowes, S. A., Knight, T. M., Gerstner, K. & May, F. Ecosystem decay exacerbates biodiversity loss with habitat loss. Nature 584, 238–243 (2020).
Google Scholar
Gonçalves-Souza, T. et al. LandFrag: a dataset to investigate the effects of forest loss and fragmentation on biodiversity. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.70015 (2025).
Arroyo-Rodríguez, V. & Fahrig, L. Why is a landscape perspective important in studies of primates? Am. J. Primatol. 76, 901–909 (2014).
Google Scholar
Hesselbarth, M. H. K., Sciaini, M., With, K. A., Wiegand, K. & Nowosad, J. landscapemetrics: an open-source R tool to calculate landscape metrics. Ecography 42, 1648–1657 (2019).
Google Scholar
Chao, A. et al. Rarefaction and extrapolation with Hill numbers: a framework for sampling and estimation in species diversity studies. Ecol. Monogr. 84, 45–67 (2014).
Google Scholar
Hsieh, T. C., Ma, K. H. & Chao, A. iNEXT: an R package for rarefaction and extrapolation of species diversity (Hill numbers). Methods Ecol. Evol. 7, 1451–1456 (2016).
Google Scholar
Marion, Z. H., Fordyce, J. A. & Fitzpatrick, B. M. Pairwise beta diversity resolves an underappreciated source of confusion in calculating species turnover. Ecology 98, 933–939 (2017).
Google Scholar
Brooks, M. E. et al. glmmTMB balances speed and flexibility among packages for zero-inflated generalized linear mixed modeling. R J. 9, 378 (2017).
Google Scholar
Hartig, F. DHARMa: residual diagnostics for hierarchical (multi-level / mixed) regression models. R package version 0.4.7 https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/DHARMa/ (2022).
Cade, B. S. Model averaging and muddled multimodel inferences. Ecology 96, 2370–2382 (2015).
Google Scholar
Viechtbauer, W. Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. J. Stat. Softw. 36, 1–48 (2010).
Google Scholar
Gonçalves-Souza, T. & Vancine, M. Zenodo https://zenodo.org/records/14885581 (2025).
