Terrestrial photosynthesis inferred from plant carbonyl sulfide uptake – Nature
Anav, A. et al. Spatiotemporal patterns of terrestrial gross primary production: a review. Rev. Geophys. 53, 785–818 (2015).
Google Scholar
Trabalka, J. R. Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide and the Global Carbon Cycle (US Department of Energy, 1986).
Bolin, B. & Fung, I. The Carbon Cycle Revisited Vol. 3 (University Corp. for Atmospheric Research, 1992).
Beer, C. et al. Terrestrial gross carbon dioxide uptake: global distribution and covariation with climate. Science 329, 834–838 (2010).
Google Scholar
Jung, M. et al. Scaling carbon fluxes from eddy covariance sites to globe: synthesis and evaluation of the FLUXCOM approach. Biogeosciences 17, 1343–1365 (2020).
Google Scholar
Ryu, Y., Berry, J. A. & Baldocchi, D. D. What is global photosynthesis? History, uncertainties and opportunities. Remote Sens. Environ. 223, 95–114 (2019).
Google Scholar
Welp, L. R. et al. Interannual variability in the oxygen isotopes of atmospheric CO2 driven by El Niño. Nature 477, 579–582 (2011).
Google Scholar
Jian, J. et al. Historically inconsistent productivity and respiration fluxes in the global terrestrial carbon cycle. Nat. Commun. 13, 1733 (2022).
Google Scholar
Friedlingstein, P. et al. Climate–carbon cycle feedback analysis: results from the C4MIP model intercomparison. J. Clim. 19, 3337–3353 (2006).
Google Scholar
Campbell, J. E. et al. Large historical growth in global terrestrial gross primary production. Nature 544, 84–87 (2017).
Google Scholar
Zhang-Zheng, H. et al. Contrasting carbon cycle along tropical forest aridity gradients in West Africa and Amazonia. Nat. Commun. 15, 3158 (2024).
Google Scholar
Canadell, J. G. et al. In Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis (ed. Brovkin, V.) Ch. 5 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2021).
Chen, M. et al. Regional contribution to variability and trends of global gross primary productivity. Environ. Res. Lett. 12, 105005 (2017).
Google Scholar
Hilton, T. W. et al. Peak growing season gross uptake of carbon in North America is largest in the Midwest USA. Nat. Clim. Change 7, 450–454 (2017).
Google Scholar
Friedlingstein, P. et al. Global carbon budget 2023. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 15, 5301–5369 (2023).
Google Scholar
Berry, J. et al. A coupled model of the global cycles of carbonyl sulfide and CO2: a possible new window on the carbon cycle. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 118, 842–852 (2013).
Google Scholar
Whelan, M. E. et al. Reviews and syntheses: carbonyl sulfide as a multi-scale tracer for carbon and water cycles. Biogeosciences 15, 3625–3657 (2018).
Google Scholar
Wehr, R. et al. Dynamics of canopy stomatal conductance, transpiration, and evaporation in a temperate deciduous forest, validated by carbonyl sulfide uptake. Biogeosciences 14, 389–401 (2017).
Google Scholar
Medlyn, B. E. et al. Reconciling the optimal and empirical approaches to modelling stomatal conductance. Glob. Chang. Biol. 17, 2134–2144 (2011).
Google Scholar
Knauer, J. et al. Mesophyll conductance in land surface models: effects on photosynthesis and transpiration. Plant J. 101, 858–873 (2020).
Google Scholar
Sun, Y. et al. Asymmetrical effects of mesophyll conductance on fundamental photosynthetic parameters and their relationships estimated from leaf gas exchange measurements. Plant Cell Environ. 37, 978–994 (2014).
Google Scholar
Jähne, B., Heinz, G. & Dietrich, W. Measurement of the diffusion coefficients of sparingly soluble gases in water. J. Geophys. Res. 92, 10767–10776 (1987).
Google Scholar
Ulshöfer, V. S., Flock, O. R., Uher, G. & Andreae, M. O. Photochemical production and air-sea exchange of carbonyl sulfide in the eastern Mediterranean Sea. Mar. Chem. 53, 25–39 (1996).
Google Scholar
Sun, Y. et al. Impact of mesophyll diffusion on estimated global land CO2 fertilization. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 15774–15779 (2014).
Google Scholar
Kooijmans, L. M. J. et al. Evaluation of carbonyl sulfide biosphere exchange in the Simple Biosphere Model (SiB4). Biogeosciences 18, 6547–6565 (2021).
Google Scholar
Sun, W., Maseyk, K., Lett, C. & Seibt, U. Stomatal control of leaf fluxes of carbonyl sulfide and CO2 in a Typha freshwater marsh. Biogeosciences 15, 3277–3291 (2018).
Google Scholar
Maseyk, K. et al. Sources and sinks of carbonyl sulfide in an agricultural field in the Southern Great Plains. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 9064–9069 (2014).
Google Scholar
Kooijmans, L. M. J. et al. Canopy uptake dominates nighttime carbonyl sulfide fluxes in a boreal forest. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 17, 11453–11465 (2017).
Google Scholar
Stimler, K., Berry, J. A., Montzka, S. A. & Yakir, D. Association between carbonyl sulfide uptake and 18D during gas exchange in C3 and C4 leaves. Plant Physiol. 157, 509–517 (2011).
Google Scholar
Terashima, I., Hanba, Y. T., Tazoe, Y., Vyas, P. & Yano, S. Irradiance and phenotype: comparative eco-development of sun and shade leaves in relation to photosynthetic CO2 diffusion. J. Exp. Bot. 57, 343–354 (2006).
Google Scholar
Niinemets, U., Díaz-Espejo, A., Flexas, J., Galmés, J. & Warren, C. R. Role of mesophyll diffusion conductance in constraining potential photosynthetic productivity in the field. J. Exp. Bot. 60, 2249–2270 (2009).
Google Scholar
Niinemets, U., Wright, I. J. & Evans, J. R. Leaf mesophyll diffusion conductance in 35 Australian sclerophylls covering a broad range of foliage structural and physiological variation. J. Exp. Bot. 60, 2433–2449 (2009).
Google Scholar
Bernacchi, C. J., Portis, A. R., Nakano, H., von Caemmerer, S. & Long, S. P. Temperature response of mesophyll conductance. Implications for the determination of Rubisco enzyme kinetics and for limitations to photosynthesis in vivo. Plant Physiol. 130, 1992–1998 (2002).
Google Scholar
Cano, F. J., López, R. & Warren, C. R. Implications of the mesophyll conductance to CO2 for photosynthesis and water-use efficiency during long-term water stress and recovery in two contrasting Eucalyptus species. Plant Cell Environ. 37, 2470–2490 (2014).
Google Scholar
Dillaway, D. N. & Kruger, E. L. Thermal acclimation of photosynthesis: a comparison of boreal and temperate tree species along a latitudinal transect. Plant Cell Environ. 33, 888–899 (2010).
Google Scholar
Campbell, J. E. et al. Photosynthetic control of atmospheric carbonyl sulfide during the growing season. Science 322, 1085–1088 (2008).
Google Scholar
Stimler, K., Montzka, S. A., Berry, J. A., Rudich, Y. & Yakir, D. Relationships between carbonyl sulfide (COS) and CO2 during leaf gas exchange. New Phytol. 186, 869–878 (2010).
Google Scholar
Kooijmans, L. M. J. et al. Influences of light and humidity on carbonyl sulfide-based estimates of photosynthesis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 2470–2475 (2019).
Google Scholar
Stimler, K., Berry, J. A. & Yakir, D. Effects of carbonyl sulfide and carbonic anhydrase on stomatal conductance. Plant Physiol. 158, 524–530 (2012).
Google Scholar
Jung, M. et al. Global patterns of land-atmosphere fluxes of carbon dioxide, latent heat, and sensible heat derived from eddy covariance, satellite, and meteorological observations. J. Geophys. Res. 116, G00J07 (2011).
Joiner, J. et al. Estimation of terrestrial global gross primary production (GPP) with satellite data-driven models and eddy covariance flux data. Remote Sens. 10, 1346 (2018).
Google Scholar
Li, X. & Xiao, J. Mapping photosynthesis solely from solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence: a global, fine-resolution dataset of gross primary production derived from OCO-2. Remote Sens. 11, 2563 (2019).
Google Scholar
Chen, J. M. et al. Effects of foliage clumping on the estimation of global terrestrial gross primary productivity. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 26, GB1019 (2012).
Jiang, C. & Ryu, Y. Multi-scale evaluation of global gross primary productivity and evapotranspiration products derived from Breathing Earth System Simulator (BESS). Remote Sens. Environ. 186, 528–547 (2016).
Google Scholar
Running, S. W. et al. A continuous satellite-derived measure of global terrestrial primary production. Bioscience 54, 547–560 (2004).
Google Scholar
Li, X. & Xiao, J. A global, 0.05-degree product of solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence derived from OCO-2, MODIS, and reanalysis data. Remote Sens. 11, 517 (2019).
Google Scholar
Malhi, Y. et al. The Global Ecosystems Monitoring network: monitoring ecosystem productivity and carbon cycling across the tropics. Biol. Conserv. 253, 108889 (2021).
Google Scholar
Restrepo-Coupe, N. et al. Do dynamic global vegetation models capture the seasonality of carbon fluxes in the Amazon basin? A data-model intercomparison. Glob. Change Biol. 23, 191–208 (2017).
Google Scholar
Worden, J. et al. Satellite observations of the tropical terrestrial carbon balance and interactions with the water cycle during the 21st century. Rev. Geophys. 59, e2020RG000711 (2021).
Kuai, L. et al. Quantifying northern high latitude gross primary productivity (GPP) using carbonyl sulfide (OCS). Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 36, e2021GB007216 (2022).
Google Scholar
Commane, R. et al. Seasonal fluxes of carbonyl sulfide in a midlatitude forest. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 14162–14167 (2015).
Google Scholar
Ma, J. et al. Inverse modelling of carbonyl sulfide: implementation, evaluation and implications for the global budget. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 21, 3507–3529 (2021).
Badger, M. R. & Price, G. D. The role of carbonic anhydrase in photosynthesis. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 45, 369–392 (1994).
Google Scholar
Evans, J. R., Caemmerer, S. V., Setchell, B. A. & Hudson, G. S. The relationship between CO2 transfer conductance and leaf anatomy in transgenic tobacco with a reduced content of Rubisco. Funct. Plant Biol. 21, 475–495 (1994).
Google Scholar
Ogée, J. et al. A new mechanistic framework to predict OCS fluxes from soils. Biogeosciences 13, 2221–2240 (2016).
Google Scholar
Meredith, L. K. et al. Coupled biological and abiotic mechanisms driving carbonyl sulfide production in soils. Soil Systems 2, 37 (2018).
Google Scholar
Meredith, L. K. et al. Soil exchange rates of COS and CO18O differ with the diversity of microbial communities and their carbonic anhydrase enzymes. ISME J. 13, 290–300 (2019).
Google Scholar
Kaisermann, A., Jones, S. P., Wohl, S., Ogée, J. & Wingate, L. Nitrogen fertilization reduces the capacity of soils to take up atmospheric carbonyl sulphide. Soil Systems 2, 62 (2018).
Google Scholar
Deepagoda, T. K. K. C. et al. Density‐corrected models for gas diffusivity and air permeability in unsaturated soil. Vadose Zone J. 10, 226–238 (2011).
Google Scholar
Millington, R. J. & Quirk, J. P. Permeability of porous solids. Trans. Faraday Soc. 57, 1200–1207 (1961).
Google Scholar
Asaf, D. et al. Ecosystem photosynthesis inferred from measurements of carbonyl sulphide flux. Nat. Geosci. 6, 186–190 (2013).
Google Scholar
Restrepo-Coupe, N. et al. LBA-ECO CD-32 flux tower network data compilation, Brazilian Amazon: 1999−2006, V2. ORNL DAAC (2021).
Wohlfahrt, G., Hammerle, A., Spielmann, F., Kitz, F. & Yi, C. Technical note: Novel estimates of the leaf relative uptake rate of carbonyl sulfide from optimality theory. Biogeosciences 20, 589–596 (2023).
Google Scholar
Wehr, R. et al. Seasonality of temperate forest photosynthesis and daytime respiration. Nature 534, 680–683 (2016).
Google Scholar
