What China’s critical mineral ban means for the US

You May Be Interested In:OpenAI has created an AI model for longevity science


The nation said it may also further restrict sales of graphite, which makes up most of the material in the lithium-ion battery anodes used in electric vehicles, grid storage plants, and consumer electronics. 

What will the bans do?

Experts say, for the most part, the bans won’t have major economic impacts. This is in part because China already restricted exports of these minerals months ago, and also because they are mostly used for niche categories within the semiconductor industry. US imports of these materials from China have already fallen as US companies figured out new sources or substitutes for the materials. 

But a recent US Geological Survey study found that outright bans on gallium and germanium by China could cut US gross domestic product by $3.4 billion. In addition, these are materials that US politicians will certainly take note of, because they “touch on many forms of security: economic, energy, and defense,” Baskaran says. 

Antimony, for example, is used in “armor-piercing ammunition, night-vision goggles, infrared sensors, bullets, and precision optics,” Baskaran and a colleague noted in a recent essay.

Companies rely on gallium to produce a variety of military and electronics components, including satellite systems, power converters, LEDs, and the high-powered chips used in electric vehicles. Germanium is used in fiber optics, infrared optics, and solar cells. 

Before it restricted the flow of these materials, China accounted for more than half of US imports of gallium and germanium, according to the US Geological Survey. Together, China and Russia control 50% of the worldwide reserves of antimony.

How does it affect climate tech?

Any tightened restrictions on graphite could have a pronounced economic impact on US battery and EV makers, in part because there are so few other sources for it. China controls about 80% of graphite output from mines and processes around 70% of the material, according to the International Energy Agency. 

“It would be very significant for batteries,” says Seaver Wang, co-director of the climate and energy team at the Breakthrough Institute, where his research is focused on minerals and manufacturing supply chains. “By weight, you need way more graphite per terawatt hour than nickel, cobalt, or lithium. And the US has essentially no operating production.”

share Paylaş facebook pinterest whatsapp x print

Similar Content

Meta’s new AI model can translate speech from more than 100 languages
Meta’s new AI model can translate speech from more than 100 languages
Three pieces of good news on climate change in 2024
Three pieces of good news on climate change in 2024
Daily briefing: New obesity definition sidelines BMI to focus on health
Daily briefing: New obesity definition sidelines BMI to focus on health
Has the Mystery of Bitcoin's Creator Been Solved?
Has the Mystery of Bitcoin’s Creator Been Solved?
To boost science, the growing BRICS group must embrace inclusion and transparency
To boost science, the growing BRICS group must embrace inclusion and transparency
Ensemble reactivations during brief rest drive fast learning of sequences - Nature
Ensemble reactivations during brief rest drive fast learning of sequences – Nature
Headline Central | © 2024 | News